• Home
  • Insights
  • SEC Releases Proposed Changes to Form 13F Report Requirements

Blog

SEC Releases Proposed Changes to Form 13F Report Requirements

Placeholder

On July 10, 2020, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) released proposed changes to the rule requiring institutional managers to file Form 13F reports.

The changes include raising the reporting threshold from $100 million to $3.5 billion and eliminating the exclusion of smaller positions from the Form 13F report.

The aim of the proposed changes is to update the Form 13F reporting thresholds to ensure that they reflect the values of current equity markets instead of the values that were appropriate in 1978 when the Form 13F report was introduced. It also creates relief for smaller investment advisers that have been required to file Form 13F reports under the current threshold.

There will be a 60-day period for public comments following the publication of the proposed rule change in the Federal register.

Read the press release here.

Background on Form 13F Reports

Rule 13f-1 was introduced in 1978 in light of a 1975 statutory requirement created by the SEC to track the holdings and investment activity of large institutional managers in the equity markets.

Currently, the rule requires that institutional managers that hold over $100 million in certain equities (“13(f) securities”) as of the last day of any month during the calendar year, are required to file a 13F report with the SEC 45 days after the end of each quarter of each year in which the institutional manager maintains over $100 million in 13(f) securities.

The SEC set the reporting threshold of $100 million, which represented a proportionate amount of equities in the marketplace held by large institutional managers in 1978; however, as markets have grown exponentially over the past 45 years, the $100 million threshold has remained static and is so low that it has reduced the significance of the threshold while placing a burden on smaller managers to meet the reporting requirements.

Proposal to Update the 13F Report Thresholds

The SEC’s new proposal would do the following:

  • Raise the reporting threshold from $100 million to $3.5 billion;
  • Require that managers reporting 13(f) securities include smaller positions;
  • Provide much need relief to smaller advisers; and
  • Require that the SEC review the threshold every 5 years to ensure that it remains relevant and accurate.

By raising the threshold to $3.5 billion, the number of large institutional managers that represent the equities market would remain proportionate to the percentage of large institutional managers represented by the threshold in 1975. The new threshold requirements would retain 90% of the current market data while relieving the requirements and costs of filing 13F reports for 90% of smaller managers.

Institutional managers that would be required to continue filing Form 13F reports would need to include smaller positions, thereby eliminating the exclusion of positions that are smaller than 10,000 shares and $200 thousand. This would be done to increase transparency and provide additional data with respect to the equity securities that the institutional managers hold.

Next, by requiring that the SEC reviews the threshold every 5 years, the SEC will be ensuring that the thresholds are revisited more often to ensure that the number of institutional managers required to submit the Form 13F reports remains proportionate to the number of equities held in the market place.

Lastly, by raising the threshold the SEC will be providing much-needed relief to smaller institutional managers in order to eliminate the time and expense required of these smaller institutional managers to file the reports under the current threshold.

Read the text of the proposed rule here.

What Should I Consider When Reviewing the Proposed Form 13F Changes?

Firms should begin by reviewing the proposed rule to determine if they would be subject to submitting the Form 13F reports under the new threshold requirements. If a firm is still required to submit the Form 13F report, they should determine if any internal reporting engines or third-party programs that assist with generating the Form 13F reports need to be adjusted to meet the new requirements to capture smaller positions. Firms should also evaluate their policies and procedures and determine if they need to be amended to reflect the new requirements including the revised thresholds and inclusion of smaller positions. Additionally, Firms that currently include the holdings of other institutional managers as part of their Form 13F reports, but may no longer be required to submit Form 13F reports under the revised threshold, should consider reviewing their existing sub-advisory and co-advisory agreements to determine if the agreements need to be updated in light of the changes.

Jacko Law Group can help your firm with analyzing the SEC’s proposed rule changes; determine if your Firm is still subject to the Form 13F reporting requirements; update existing policies and procedures to ensure compliance with the revised rule should it come into effect;  provide guidance on how to implement steps for reporting smaller positions; and, review existing sub-advisory and co-advisory agreements to determine if they should be updated in light of the rule change. Our team of attorneys will use our extensive experience to assist you with determining if you are still subject to the Form 13F reporting requirements under the rule changes and making sure that you have adequate controls in place to remain compliant.

About the author

Jacko Law Group provides tailored legal services and effective strategies for success, delivering exemplary solutions to complex legal and regulatory challenges to ensure that both business efforts and compliance obligations are satisfied.

Related Insights

Posted on Google Google
Alan Markfeld profile picture
Alan Markfeld
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Dharmi is an excellent securities lawyer who understands the law as it pertains to these cases. She is extremely proactive and represents her clients well. I highly recommend Jacko and Dharmi.
Posted on Google Google
Danielle Martin profile picture
Danielle Martin
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I’ve had the privilege of working closely with this firm in my role as Chief Compliance Officer and I can confidently say they are an exceptional compliance partner. Their depth of experience is immediately evidentand they bring a level of practical knowledge. What I truly enjoy is their ability to translate complex regulatory requirements into plain English, often using real, everyday examples that make implementation far more manageable. They are also incredibly responsive and reliable. In a field where timing matters, their prompt communication and thoughtful guidance have been invaluable. If you’re looking for a compliance attorney who combines expertise, clarity, and professionalism, I highly recommend them.
Posted on Google Google
Curt Rocca profile picture
Curt Rocca
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Michelle and the team at Jacko Law Group have helped guide through a variety of critical circumstances as we ventured through the uncharted and unfamiliar territory of becoming and successfully operating as an RIA. I have particularly appreciated Michelle's personal involvement and genuine caring about us and our organization. She has been responsive and her counsel has been consistently on-point and helpful. She artfully guided us through our initial filing process and first SEC exam process - which went very well. Very grateful to Michelle and her team.
Posted on Google Google
Nicholas Di Paolo profile picture
Nicholas Di Paolo
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Michelle and her team were excellent to work with, front to back. They helped me to understand the challenges ahead and were always proactive in their consultation through every step of my transition. JLG truly know the wealth management industry very well and did a great job of understanding the challenges unique to my business. Without them, I can confidently say I would not have felt as comfortable through the transition as I did. Fortunately, that's not something that stops there - Michelle and her team have kept in touch to ensure that I'm on top of certain administrative issues, trends, and simply showing me that they care about my business and success. I look forward to continuing to work with them for many years to come.
Posted on Google Google
Margery Neis profile picture
Margery Neis
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Dharmi Mehta was extremely helpful when my business partner and I transitioned to a new RIA firm. She and her staff were all very professional. Her guidance during our transition was invaluable. I highly recommend Dharmi and Jacko Law Group.
Posted on Google Google
Joseph Burwell profile picture
Joseph Burwell
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Dharmi and Amandeep were a delight to work with. They assisted me with a claim and stuck with me the entire way through. Dharmi's advice was invaluable, and I was most impressed by her clear and professional communication. From beginning-to-end, both Dharmi and Amandeep kept me well informed. Their entire team are proud of their work and rightfully so. Thank you!
Posted on Google Google
Faruk Jaffer profile picture
Faruk Jaffer
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
My mentor once told me that a good attorney is worth their weight in gold — and that couldn't be more true of Michelle and Amanda. Their expertise, professionalism, and responsiveness were top notch every step of the way. It's rare to find legal partners who are not only sharp and thorough, but also genuinely invested in your success. I’m grateful for their guidance and highly recommend them to anyone seeking trusted legal counsel.
Posted on Google Google
everistus etafo profile picture
everistus etafo
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
It is my great Privilege to share my Review of what Atty Dharmi Mehta of Jacko Law Group did for me and by extension for my family. From the first time complimentary conversation we had having spoken to several other Lawyers ,l knew she was the right person for the Job .Because of her background as a former RR ,she was professional,kind, Empathetic,listened and was focused on fighting for me. From a potential of been terminated with cause ,l was able to walk away with a clean U5 with a validation that l did nothing wrong except what was in the best Interest of my clients. I hope nobody ever has to go through what l have Experienced, but if you do ,you want Dharmi Mehta beside you .Rest assured your service Deserve 10 stars but this forum only allows 5. Me and my family are forever grateful and will make sure that any RR who needs an advocate will know about you . Everistus Etafo
Posted on Google Google
Karen Althaus profile picture
Karen Althaus
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I have worked with Jacko Law Group for 2 different business situations that necessitated an attorney. In both cases, the team was very thorough & competent. Their attention to our situation and the extra effort they put into our case(s) was very much appreciated. I would highly recommend Jacko Law Group!