Our attorneys are skilled in representing clients in collaborative efforts to reach resolution when disputes arise. Non judicial methods of resolutions such as mediation or arbitration can offer a more cost-effective, less time-consuming and low-conflict alternative to highly contested traditional litigation. In addition, we represent clients in arbitration against regulatory bodies such as the SEC and FINRA when that option is available, pushing for fair resolutions.
If you are faced with a client or partner dispute, or an enforcement inquiry, investigation, or enforcement action, we encourage you to speak to one of our attorneys to examine your options. JLG Attorneys have vast experience and can help you determine if your case is suited for Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) such as arbitration, mediation, or if traditional litigation is a better option.
Business contracts increasingly include provisions for mediation and arbitration as methods for resolving disputes. Many of these contracts specify administration by organizations such as the American Arbitration Association® (AAA), JAMS, or FINRA, among others, which offer a wide range of conflict management procedures. The inclusion of an arbitration or mediation clause can give the parties significant control over the process, including the selection of the arbitrator or mediator. A well-crafted dispute resolution clause offers certainty by outlining the process before a dispute arises, reducing the potential for disagreement later. Our team will help identify the most appropriate ADR mechanism and draft tailored ADR provisions to suit your specific needs.
Transactional clients often have ongoing business relationships, so ADR methods like mediation can be preferred to maintain positive working ties while resolving disputes. Including ADR provisions in contracts allows for quicker dispute resolution by facilitating early discussions and negotiations before issues escalate. Maintaining open communication and a collaborative approach throughout the ADR process is key to achieving a successful outcome.
Whether you wish to resolve part or all of the dispute, ADR can be beneficial for most civil disputes, offering a resolution without the need to file a lawsuit. ADR is typically less formal, less expensive, and less time-consuming than a trial.
Jacko Law Group attorneys are trained to focus on specific types of ADR or particular stages of the litigation process to help you mitigate and minimize costs. Our clients often prefer mediation or arbitration over traditional litigation because they generally have more control over the process and the outcome compared to a court case.
Jacko Law Group will help determine whether mediation or arbitration is right for you, considering the complexity of the dispute. We will also assess the potential for compromise, specifically when there is room for negotiation and a mutually beneficial outcome for the parties involved.
Our attorneys will also take into account other factors, such as:
• Time and benefits of a quicker resolution
• The importance of maintaining a business relationship, and if preserving the relationship with the other party is crucial
• Cost concerns, especially when the potential costs of litigation are high