• Home
  • Insights
  • How The Jobs Act of 2012 Will Impact Financial Institutions

Formation Services

How The Jobs Act of 2012 Will Impact Financial Institutions

Placeholder
Introduction The Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act ("JOBS Act"), which was signed into law by the President on April 5, 2012, is designed to assist companies and individuals raise capital. The Act is divided into six (6) titles, each of which is summarized below:
  • Title I loosens the registration and disclosure requirements for companies filing their IPO if they can qualify as an "Emerging Growth Company;"
  • Title II provides relief from the prohibition on general solicitation and general advertising for the sale of securities under Rules 506 and 144A of the Securities Act of 1933;
  • Title III allows for "CROWDFUNDING" through funding portals for offerings up to $1 million;
  • Title IV creates a new exemption for private offerings up to $50 million; and
  • Titles V and VI offer private companies flexibility by increasing the total number of assets a company may have prior to registering its securities from $1 million to $10 million and also increases the number of investors private companies may have prior to registering its securities from 750 to 2000 people (as long as no more than 500 investors are non-accredited).
This month's Risk Management Tip will focus on Titles I and II, both of which are summarized below and are of particular interest to our clientele. Title I - Focus on Emerging Growth Companies Title I creates a new category of IPO issuer - an "Emerging Growth Company" ("EGC"). A company is classified as an EGC if total gross revenues are less than $1 billion. A company will remain classified as an EGC until one of the following occurs:
  • The company has total annual gross revenues of $1 billion or more (adjusted every five (5) years for inflation);
  • It has been five (5) years since the company's IPO;
  • The company has issued more than $1 billion in non-convertible debt during the previous three (3) year period; or
  • The company is deemed to be a "large accelerated filer."1
Classification as an EGC provides several forms of relief from disclosure, compliance and governance obligations, which may help to make the IPO process more affordable. Companies that qualify as an EGC benefit from the following:
  • No Compensation Disclosure. They will not be required to gain shareholder approval for executive compensation and golden parachute compensation;
  • Only Two Years of Financial Statements. The IPO registration statement will only need audited financial statements for the two prior fiscal years (rather than three). Subsequent reports to be filed with the Commission need not include selected financial data prior to the earliest audited period presented with its first registration statement.
  • No New U.S. GAAP Standards. The EGC is not required to comply with any new or revised financial accounting standards that are not applicable to non-registered companies.
  • Exempt From Some New PCAOB Rules. An EGC will not be required to comply with some potential new rules under consideration by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board ("PCAOB"). For example, the EGC will not be required to comply with mandatory audit firm rotations nor will they be required to have the auditing firm include a discussion and analysis in its reports from the audit (both of which are being considered right now).2 Moreover, any additional rules by the PCAOB shall not apply to an EGC unless the Commission determines they are necessary or appropriate.
  • Increased Availability of Research to Investors. The publication or distribution of "research reports" by a broker-dealer will not constitute an offer for sale or offer to sell, even if the broker-dealer is participating or will participate in the IPO. In addition, broker-dealers will not be required to comply with restrictions relating to post-offering research blackout periods of EGCs.
  • Confidential Draft Registration. The EGC may confidentially submit a draft registration statement to the SEC for confidential non-public review by the staff prior to public filing, as long as the initial confidential submission will be publicly filed not later than 21 days before the issuer conducts a "road show." This requirement allows for public comparisons between the initial filed documents and later revisions.
  • No Auditor Attestation Report on Internal Controls. The EGC is not required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements in Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act as long as it remains an EGC, unless the Commission determines that such additional requirements are necessary or appropriate.
  • Modernization of the S-K registration. Notably, within 180 days of the signing of the JOBS Act, the SEC shall review and determine how to simplify and modernize the S-K registration process to reduce the costs and other burdens for EGCs.
Title II - Access to Capital for Job Creators Title II provides relief from the ban on general solicitation and general advertising for:
  • Securities offered under Rule 506 of the Securities Act of 1933 so long as all purchasers are accredited and the issuer takes reasonable steps to verify the purchaser is an accredited investor; and
  • Securities offered under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933, provided all purchasers are "reasonably believed" to be Qualified Institutional Buyers ("QIBs").
The SEC has 90 days from the date of Title II's enactment to promulgate new rules on these provisions. Currently a company that wishes to raise funds through Rule 506 of Regulation D cannot offer its securities through general solicitation or advertising. For the exemption to apply the company must have a pre-existing business or personal relationship with the investor. The JOBS Act requires the SEC to remove this prohibition on general solicitation and advertising, and adopt regulations that provide (1) all purchasers of the securities must be accredited investors, and (2) the issuer must take reasonable steps to verify the purchasers of the securities are accredited. Consequently, the JOBS Act expands the methods by which securities can be sold under Rule 506. Once the rule is in effect, an individual who offers and sells securities in compliance with Rule 506 will not be subject to registration as a broker-dealer solely because they:
  • Maintain a platform or mechanism that permits the offer, sale, purchase, negotiation, general solicitation, general advertisements or other similar activities, whether online or other means;
  • Co-invest in such securities; or
  • Provide ancillary services3 with respect to such securities.
This flexibility will have substantial impact on the way private funds conduct business today. Conclusion While the JOBS Act is designed to spur investment activity in various forms, ongoing evaluation of regulatory guidance and interpretation will be required to ensure compliance with the rules' requirements. For more information on the JOBS Act and how it may impact your company, please contact us at [email protected] or (619) 298-2880. JLG works extensively with investment advisers, broker-dealers, investment companies, hedge funds, private equity firms, banks and financial professionals on securities and corporate law regulatory matters. This article is for information purposes and does not contain or convey legal advice. The information herein should not be relied upon in regard to any particular facts or circumstances without first consulting with a lawyer.
1 A "large accelerated filer" is defined in 17 CFR 240.12b-2 as an issuer after it first meets the following conditions as of the end of its fiscal year: (i) The issuer had an aggregate worldwide market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by its non-affiliates of $700 million or more, as of the last business day of the issuer's most recently completed second fiscal quarter; (ii) The issuer has been subject to the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Act for a period of at least twelve calendar months; (iii) The issuer has filed at least one annual report pursuant to section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Act; and (iv) The issuer is not eligible to use Forms 10KSB and 10QSB for its annual and quarterly reports. 2 http://www.journalofaccountancy.com/Issues/2012/Mar/Auditing.htm. 3 Ancillary services allowed include due diligence services (so long as no investment advice is given for separate compensation) and providing standardized transaction documents to both issuers and investors.

About the author

Jacko Law Group provides tailored legal services and effective strategies for success, delivering exemplary solutions to complex legal and regulatory challenges to ensure that both business efforts and compliance obligations are satisfied.

Related Insights

Posted on Google Google
Alan Markfeld profile picture
Alan Markfeld
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Dharmi is an excellent securities lawyer who understands the law as it pertains to these cases. She is extremely proactive and represents her clients well. I highly recommend Jacko and Dharmi.
Posted on Google Google
Danielle Martin profile picture
Danielle Martin
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I’ve had the privilege of working closely with this firm in my role as Chief Compliance Officer and I can confidently say they are an exceptional compliance partner. Their depth of experience is immediately evidentand they bring a level of practical knowledge. What I truly enjoy is their ability to translate complex regulatory requirements into plain English, often using real, everyday examples that make implementation far more manageable. They are also incredibly responsive and reliable. In a field where timing matters, their prompt communication and thoughtful guidance have been invaluable. If you’re looking for a compliance attorney who combines expertise, clarity, and professionalism, I highly recommend them.
Posted on Google Google
Curt Rocca profile picture
Curt Rocca
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Michelle and the team at Jacko Law Group have helped guide through a variety of critical circumstances as we ventured through the uncharted and unfamiliar territory of becoming and successfully operating as an RIA. I have particularly appreciated Michelle's personal involvement and genuine caring about us and our organization. She has been responsive and her counsel has been consistently on-point and helpful. She artfully guided us through our initial filing process and first SEC exam process - which went very well. Very grateful to Michelle and her team.
Posted on Google Google
Nicholas Di Paolo profile picture
Nicholas Di Paolo
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Michelle and her team were excellent to work with, front to back. They helped me to understand the challenges ahead and were always proactive in their consultation through every step of my transition. JLG truly know the wealth management industry very well and did a great job of understanding the challenges unique to my business. Without them, I can confidently say I would not have felt as comfortable through the transition as I did. Fortunately, that's not something that stops there - Michelle and her team have kept in touch to ensure that I'm on top of certain administrative issues, trends, and simply showing me that they care about my business and success. I look forward to continuing to work with them for many years to come.
Posted on Google Google
Margery Neis profile picture
Margery Neis
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Dharmi Mehta was extremely helpful when my business partner and I transitioned to a new RIA firm. She and her staff were all very professional. Her guidance during our transition was invaluable. I highly recommend Dharmi and Jacko Law Group.
Posted on Google Google
Joseph Burwell profile picture
Joseph Burwell
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Dharmi and Amandeep were a delight to work with. They assisted me with a claim and stuck with me the entire way through. Dharmi's advice was invaluable, and I was most impressed by her clear and professional communication. From beginning-to-end, both Dharmi and Amandeep kept me well informed. Their entire team are proud of their work and rightfully so. Thank you!
Posted on Google Google
Faruk Jaffer profile picture
Faruk Jaffer
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
My mentor once told me that a good attorney is worth their weight in gold — and that couldn't be more true of Michelle and Amanda. Their expertise, professionalism, and responsiveness were top notch every step of the way. It's rare to find legal partners who are not only sharp and thorough, but also genuinely invested in your success. I’m grateful for their guidance and highly recommend them to anyone seeking trusted legal counsel.
Posted on Google Google
everistus etafo profile picture
everistus etafo
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
It is my great Privilege to share my Review of what Atty Dharmi Mehta of Jacko Law Group did for me and by extension for my family. From the first time complimentary conversation we had having spoken to several other Lawyers ,l knew she was the right person for the Job .Because of her background as a former RR ,she was professional,kind, Empathetic,listened and was focused on fighting for me. From a potential of been terminated with cause ,l was able to walk away with a clean U5 with a validation that l did nothing wrong except what was in the best Interest of my clients. I hope nobody ever has to go through what l have Experienced, but if you do ,you want Dharmi Mehta beside you .Rest assured your service Deserve 10 stars but this forum only allows 5. Me and my family are forever grateful and will make sure that any RR who needs an advocate will know about you . Everistus Etafo
Posted on Google Google
Karen Althaus profile picture
Karen Althaus
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I have worked with Jacko Law Group for 2 different business situations that necessitated an attorney. In both cases, the team was very thorough & competent. Their attention to our situation and the extra effort they put into our case(s) was very much appreciated. I would highly recommend Jacko Law Group!