Posted on Google Google
Alan Markfeld profile picture
Alan Markfeld
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Dharmi is an excellent securities lawyer who understands the law as it pertains to these cases. She is extremely proactive and represents her clients well. I highly recommend Jacko and Dharmi.
Posted on Google Google
Danielle Martin profile picture
Danielle Martin
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I’ve had the privilege of working closely with this firm in my role as Chief Compliance Officer and I can confidently say they are an exceptional compliance partner. Their depth of experience is immediately evidentand they bring a level of practical knowledge. What I truly enjoy is their ability to translate complex regulatory requirements into plain English, often using real, everyday examples that make implementation far more manageable. They are also incredibly responsive and reliable. In a field where timing matters, their prompt communication and thoughtful guidance have been invaluable. If you’re looking for a compliance attorney who combines expertise, clarity, and professionalism, I highly recommend them.
Posted on Google Google
Curt Rocca profile picture
Curt Rocca
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Michelle and the team at Jacko Law Group have helped guide through a variety of critical circumstances as we ventured through the uncharted and unfamiliar territory of becoming and successfully operating as an RIA. I have particularly appreciated Michelle's personal involvement and genuine caring about us and our organization. She has been responsive and her counsel has been consistently on-point and helpful. She artfully guided us through our initial filing process and first SEC exam process - which went very well. Very grateful to Michelle and her team.
Posted on Google Google
Nicholas Di Paolo profile picture
Nicholas Di Paolo
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Michelle and her team were excellent to work with, front to back. They helped me to understand the challenges ahead and were always proactive in their consultation through every step of my transition. JLG truly know the wealth management industry very well and did a great job of understanding the challenges unique to my business. Without them, I can confidently say I would not have felt as comfortable through the transition as I did. Fortunately, that's not something that stops there - Michelle and her team have kept in touch to ensure that I'm on top of certain administrative issues, trends, and simply showing me that they care about my business and success. I look forward to continuing to work with them for many years to come.
Posted on Google Google
Margery Neis profile picture
Margery Neis
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Dharmi Mehta was extremely helpful when my business partner and I transitioned to a new RIA firm. She and her staff were all very professional. Her guidance during our transition was invaluable. I highly recommend Dharmi and Jacko Law Group.
Posted on Google Google
Joseph Burwell profile picture
Joseph Burwell
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Dharmi and Amandeep were a delight to work with. They assisted me with a claim and stuck with me the entire way through. Dharmi's advice was invaluable, and I was most impressed by her clear and professional communication. From beginning-to-end, both Dharmi and Amandeep kept me well informed. Their entire team are proud of their work and rightfully so. Thank you!
Posted on Google Google
Faruk Jaffer profile picture
Faruk Jaffer
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
My mentor once told me that a good attorney is worth their weight in gold — and that couldn't be more true of Michelle and Amanda. Their expertise, professionalism, and responsiveness were top notch every step of the way. It's rare to find legal partners who are not only sharp and thorough, but also genuinely invested in your success. I’m grateful for their guidance and highly recommend them to anyone seeking trusted legal counsel.
Posted on Google Google
everistus etafo profile picture
everistus etafo
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
It is my great Privilege to share my Review of what Atty Dharmi Mehta of Jacko Law Group did for me and by extension for my family. From the first time complimentary conversation we had having spoken to several other Lawyers ,l knew she was the right person for the Job .Because of her background as a former RR ,she was professional,kind, Empathetic,listened and was focused on fighting for me. From a potential of been terminated with cause ,l was able to walk away with a clean U5 with a validation that l did nothing wrong except what was in the best Interest of my clients. I hope nobody ever has to go through what l have Experienced, but if you do ,you want Dharmi Mehta beside you .Rest assured your service Deserve 10 stars but this forum only allows 5. Me and my family are forever grateful and will make sure that any RR who needs an advocate will know about you . Everistus Etafo
Posted on Google Google
Karen Althaus profile picture
Karen Althaus
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I have worked with Jacko Law Group for 2 different business situations that necessitated an attorney. In both cases, the team was very thorough & competent. Their attention to our situation and the extra effort they put into our case(s) was very much appreciated. I would highly recommend Jacko Law Group!
  • Home
  • Insights
  • SEC Proposes Significant Reporting Requirements For Investment Advisers To Private Funds

Filings & Registrations

SEC Proposes Significant Reporting Requirements For Investment Advisers To Private Funds

Placeholder

On January 26, 2011 the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) issued a release1 proposing new rule 204(b)-1 under the Investment Advisers Act of 19402 to require registered investment advisers to report systemic risk information to the SEC if the adviser advises one or more private funds.3 The information collected would be made available to the Financial Stability Oversight Council (“FSOC”), as required by Section 404 of the Dodd-Frank Act, in order for the FSOC to monitor and assess the systemic risk that may be associated with the operation of private funds. The new disclosure document is known as Form PF, and the amount of information a private fund adviser would be required to report would vary based on both the size and type of funds it advises. Accordingly, the type and amount of information that would be required to be disclosed depends upon whether the adviser oversees hedge funds,4 liquidity funds,5 or private equity funds.6 “Large Private Fund Advisers” would be subject to quarterly filings, while all other private fund advisers would file Form PF only once a year and would report less information regarding the private funds they advise. The instructions to proposed Form PF define “Large Private Fund Advisers” as advisers to private funds with over $1 billion in assets under management (“AUM”).

While Form PF is a very lengthy disclosure document that will require detailed responses,7 it would only be required to be filed by advisers to private funds registered or required to be registered with the SEC.8 Consequently, advisers relying on an exemption from registering with both of these regulators would not be subject to Form PF filing requirements. However, those required to file Form PF would continue to be required to file Form ADV.

Section 1 of Form PF – Required by All Registered Advisers to Private Funds

Section 1 of Form PF would apply to all investment advisers required to file the form. Accordingly, all registered private fund advisers would be required to disclose information regarding each private fund they advise on Section 1 of Form PF regardless of AUM or type of funds advised. Under Section 1 of Form PF, advisers would include the following information:

  • The private funds’ total and net AUM, the amount of those assets that are attributable to certain types of private funds and the aggregate value of its derivative positions, if any;
  • Information about the fund’s borrowing practices, including a breakdown of the fund’s lending based on whether the creditor is a U.S. financial institution, foreign financial institution or non-financial institution;
  • The identity of, and amount owed to, each creditor to which the fund owed an amount equal to or greater than 5% of the fund’s net asset value as of the reporting date;
  • Basic information about how concentrated the fund’s investor base is, such as the number of beneficial owners of the fund’s equity and the percentage of the fund’s equity held by the five largest equity holders;
  • Monthly and quarterly performance information about each private fund advised; and
  • Information only about the hedge funds managed by the adviser, such as the hedge fund’s investment strategies, percentage of the fund’s assets managed using computer-driven trading algorithms, significant trading counterparty exposures (including identity of counterparties), and trading and clearing practices.9

Section 2 of Form PF – Required by Large Hedge Fund Advisers

Form PF would require private fund advisers who had at least $1 billion in hedge fund AUM as of the close of business on any day during the reporting period to complete Section 2. Under this section, the following information would be required:

  • Exposure by asset class in different securities and commodities (g., different types of equities, fixed income securities, derivatives, and structured products), the duration of fixed income holdings, geographical breakdown of investments, and turnover of the portfolio; and
  • For each hedge fund advised by the adviser having AUM of at least $500 million (“Qualifying Hedge Fund”) Section 2 would also require information concerning:
    • Portfolio liquidity, position concentration, collateral practices, risk metrics, financing information, central clearing counterparties, borrowing and derivatives exposure, and other information on the Qualifying Hedge Fund’s investors and financing arrangements.10

Section 3 of Form PF – Required by Large Liquidity Fund Advisers

Section 3 would be required to be completed by private fund advisers advising liquidity funds and registered money market funds having combined AUM of at least $1 billion. Under this section the adviser would be required to disclose:

  • Whether the liquidity fund uses the amortized cost method of valuation and/or the penny rounding method of pricing in computing its net asset value per share;
  • For each month of the reporting period, the liquidity fund’s net asset value and net asset value per share; and
  • The amount of the liquidity fund’s assets invested in different types of instruments, broken down by the maturity of those instruments, as well as information for each open position of the fund that represents 5 percent or more of the fund’s net asset value and reporting of any secured or unsecured borrowing of the liquidity fund.11

Section 4 of Form PF – Required by Large Private Equity Fund Advisers

Section 4 of Form PF would be required to be completed by private fund advisers managing at least $1 billion in private equity fund assets as of the close of business on the last day of the reporting period. Under this section, such advisers would be required to provide information regarding:

  • The outstanding balance of the fund’s borrowings and guarantees, and the leverage of the portfolio companies in which the fund invests;
  • A breakdown of the fund’s investments by industry and by geography; and
  • Additional information if the fund invests in any financial industry portfolio company, such as its name, its debt-to-equity ratio, and the percentage of the portfolio company beneficially owned by the fund.12

Confidentiality of Form PF

As outlined above, Form PF would include nonpublic information about private funds, their advisers and their trading strategies the disclosure of which could adversely affect the funds and their investors. In the proposing release, the SEC indicated that it does not intend to make Form PF information identifiable to any particular adviser or private fund, although it would make the information available to the FSOC, as required by the Dodd Frank Act. Additionally, the SEC may use Form PF in regulatory programs, examinations and investigations, and in investor protection efforts, such as enforcement actions and may share such information with foreign regulators to assist in its efforts to combat systemic risk.

Conclusion

While the information required to be included in Form PF is designed to assist the FSOC in identifying and managing risks that could affect the U.S. and global financial systems, the process of completing the form may help fund advisers and compliance personnel identify and manage risks affecting their respective firms.

The SEC is currently seeking public comment on proposed Form PF and proposed Rule 204(b)-1. To submit a comment, send an e-mail to [email protected] and include File Number S7-05-11 in the subject line.

JLG works extensively with investment advisers, broker-dealers, investment companies, hedge funds and banks on legal and regulatory compliance matters.

For more information about this topic and other legal services, please contact us at (619) 298-2880, [email protected] or visit www.jackolg.com. Thank you.

This article is for information purposes and does not contain or convey legal advice. The information herein should not be relied upon in regard to any particular facts or circumstances without first consulting with a lawyer.


1 Reporting by Investment Advisers to Private Funds and Certain Commodity Pool Operators and Commodity Trading Advisors on Form PF, Advisers Act Release No. 3145, 76 Fed. Reg. 8068 (proposed Feb. 11, 2011) (to be codified at 17 C.F.R. pts. 4, 275, 279) available at http://sec.gov/rules/proposed/2011/ia-3145fr.pdf [hereinafter Release].

2 15 U.S.C. § 80b.

3 A “private fund” is defined in Section 202(a)(29) of the Advisers Act as an issuer that would be an investment company but for the exemptions found in Section 3(c)(1) or 3(c)(7) of the Investment Company Act of 1940. 15 U.S.C. § 80b- 2(a)(29).

4 Proposed Form PF would define “hedge fund” as any private fund that (1) has a performance fee or allocation calculated by taking into account unrealized gains; (2) may borrow an amount in excess of one-half of its net asset value (including any committed capital) or may have gross notional exposure in excess of twice its net asset value (including any committed capital); or (3) may sell securities or other assets short. Release, supra note 1, at 8075.

5 The proposed Form PF would define a liquidity fund as a private fund that seeks to generate income by investing in a portfolio of short-term obligations in order to maintain a stable net asset value per unit or minimize principal volatility for investors. Id. As proposed, liquidity funds would thus resemble private money market funds.

6 The proposed Form PF would define a private equity fund as “any private fund that is not a hedge fund, liquidity fund, real estate fund, securitized asset fund or venture capital fund and does not provide investors with redemption rights in the ordinary course.” Id.

7 As proposed, Form PF is 44 pages long.

8 Proposed Advisers Act Rule 204(b)-1. Commodity Pool Operators and Commodity Trading Advisers registered with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) would be required to file Form PF with respect to any advised commodity pool that is a “private fund.” Proposed Commodity Exchange Act Rule 4.27(d).

9 Release, supra note 1, at 8079-80.

10 Id. at 8080-82.

11 Id. at 8082-83.

12 Id. at 8083.

About the author

Jacko Law Group provides tailored legal services and effective strategies for success, delivering exemplary solutions to complex legal and regulatory challenges to ensure that both business efforts and compliance obligations are satisfied.

Related Insights