Posted on Google Google
Alan Markfeld profile picture
Alan Markfeld
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Dharmi is an excellent securities lawyer who understands the law as it pertains to these cases. She is extremely proactive and represents her clients well. I highly recommend Jacko and Dharmi.
Posted on Google Google
Danielle Martin profile picture
Danielle Martin
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I’ve had the privilege of working closely with this firm in my role as Chief Compliance Officer and I can confidently say they are an exceptional compliance partner. Their depth of experience is immediately evidentand they bring a level of practical knowledge. What I truly enjoy is their ability to translate complex regulatory requirements into plain English, often using real, everyday examples that make implementation far more manageable. They are also incredibly responsive and reliable. In a field where timing matters, their prompt communication and thoughtful guidance have been invaluable. If you’re looking for a compliance attorney who combines expertise, clarity, and professionalism, I highly recommend them.
Posted on Google Google
Curt Rocca profile picture
Curt Rocca
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Michelle and the team at Jacko Law Group have helped guide through a variety of critical circumstances as we ventured through the uncharted and unfamiliar territory of becoming and successfully operating as an RIA. I have particularly appreciated Michelle's personal involvement and genuine caring about us and our organization. She has been responsive and her counsel has been consistently on-point and helpful. She artfully guided us through our initial filing process and first SEC exam process - which went very well. Very grateful to Michelle and her team.
Posted on Google Google
Nicholas Di Paolo profile picture
Nicholas Di Paolo
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Michelle and her team were excellent to work with, front to back. They helped me to understand the challenges ahead and were always proactive in their consultation through every step of my transition. JLG truly know the wealth management industry very well and did a great job of understanding the challenges unique to my business. Without them, I can confidently say I would not have felt as comfortable through the transition as I did. Fortunately, that's not something that stops there - Michelle and her team have kept in touch to ensure that I'm on top of certain administrative issues, trends, and simply showing me that they care about my business and success. I look forward to continuing to work with them for many years to come.
Posted on Google Google
Margery Neis profile picture
Margery Neis
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Dharmi Mehta was extremely helpful when my business partner and I transitioned to a new RIA firm. She and her staff were all very professional. Her guidance during our transition was invaluable. I highly recommend Dharmi and Jacko Law Group.
Posted on Google Google
Joseph Burwell profile picture
Joseph Burwell
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Dharmi and Amandeep were a delight to work with. They assisted me with a claim and stuck with me the entire way through. Dharmi's advice was invaluable, and I was most impressed by her clear and professional communication. From beginning-to-end, both Dharmi and Amandeep kept me well informed. Their entire team are proud of their work and rightfully so. Thank you!
Posted on Google Google
Faruk Jaffer profile picture
Faruk Jaffer
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
My mentor once told me that a good attorney is worth their weight in gold — and that couldn't be more true of Michelle and Amanda. Their expertise, professionalism, and responsiveness were top notch every step of the way. It's rare to find legal partners who are not only sharp and thorough, but also genuinely invested in your success. I’m grateful for their guidance and highly recommend them to anyone seeking trusted legal counsel.
Posted on Google Google
everistus etafo profile picture
everistus etafo
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
It is my great Privilege to share my Review of what Atty Dharmi Mehta of Jacko Law Group did for me and by extension for my family. From the first time complimentary conversation we had having spoken to several other Lawyers ,l knew she was the right person for the Job .Because of her background as a former RR ,she was professional,kind, Empathetic,listened and was focused on fighting for me. From a potential of been terminated with cause ,l was able to walk away with a clean U5 with a validation that l did nothing wrong except what was in the best Interest of my clients. I hope nobody ever has to go through what l have Experienced, but if you do ,you want Dharmi Mehta beside you .Rest assured your service Deserve 10 stars but this forum only allows 5. Me and my family are forever grateful and will make sure that any RR who needs an advocate will know about you . Everistus Etafo
Posted on Google Google
Karen Althaus profile picture
Karen Althaus
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I have worked with Jacko Law Group for 2 different business situations that necessitated an attorney. In both cases, the team was very thorough & competent. Their attention to our situation and the extra effort they put into our case(s) was very much appreciated. I would highly recommend Jacko Law Group!
  • Home
  • Insights
  • DOL Proposes Expansive New Definition Of “Fiduciary” Under ERISA

Legal Risk Management Tips

DOL Proposes Expansive New Definition Of “Fiduciary” Under ERISA

Placeholder

On October 21, 2010, the U.S. Department of Labor ("DOL") published a proposed rule that would amend the definition of "fiduciary" and would significantly expand the categories of persons who would be deemed to be fiduciaries subject to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA").1 In addition to its application under ERISA, the Proposed Rule would also apply for purposes of the prohibited transaction provisions in Section 4975 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, and thus would cover investment advisers to IRAs in addition to ERISA-covered plans.2

Section 3(21)(A) of ERISA defines the term "fiduciary" to include any person who "renders investment advice for a fee or other compensation" with respect to a plan.3 The DOL's current rule defining what constitutes providing "investment advice" requires that a person: (1) render advice as to the value of securities or other property or the advisability of investing in securities or other property, (2) that is provided on a regular basis, (3) pursuant to a mutual understanding, (4) that the advice will serve as a primary basis for investment decisions, and (5) that the advice will be based on the individualized needs of the plan.4

The Proposed Rule would eliminate the above 5-factor test. If adopted, a person will be an ERISA fiduciary if, for a fee or other compensation: (1) it provides one of three types of advice to an employee benefit plan, a plan fiduciary, a plan participant or a plan beneficiary; and (2) the advice is provided under any one of four circumstances set forth in the Proposed Rule. 5

Under the Proposed Rule, giving one of the following types of advice to an employee benefit plan, a plan fiduciary, a plan participant or a plan beneficiary may give rise to fiduciary status under ERISA: (1) advice, appraisals or fairness opinions concerning the value of securities or other property; (2) recommendations as to the advisability of investing in, purchasing, holding, or selling securities or other property; or (3) advice or recommendations as to the management of securities or other property (including recommendations as to proxy voting and the selection of asset managers).6

A person providing one of the types of investment advice listed above will be considered a fiduciary under the Proposed Rule if the person also meets one of the following conditions:

  • The person represents or acknowledges that it is acting as a fiduciary within the meaning of ERISA with respect to such advice or recommendations;
  • The person exercises any discretionary authority or discretionary control with respect to management of the plan, exercises any authority or control with respect to management or disposition of its assets, or has any discretionary authority or discretionary responsibility in the administration of the plan;
  • The person is an "investment adviser" within the meaning of Section 202(a)(11) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, whether or not such person is actually registered with the SEC as an investment adviser; or
  • The person provides one of the types of investment advice listed above pursuant to an agreement, written or otherwise, between such person and the plan, plan fiduciary, plan participant, or plan beneficiary, that such advice may be considered in connection with making investment or management decisions with respect to plan assets, and will be individualized to the needs of the plan, plan fiduciary, plan participant or plan beneficiary.7

The Proposed Rule would eliminate the requirement under the current rule that the advice be provided on a "regular basis."8 Therefore, under the Proposed Rule a person who provides advice on a particular investment on a one-time basis may be considered a fiduciary.9 Moreover, the current requirement that the parties understand that the advice will serve as a "primary basis" for investment decisions would no longer apply under the Proposed Rule. Accordingly, the fact that the understanding of the parties is that the advice may be considered in connection with making a decision relating to plan assets is sufficient to impose fiduciary status.10

The Proposed Rule includes certain exceptions as to situations where a person would not be considered to be providing investment advice.11 Nevertheless, if adopted substantially as proposed, the Proposed Rule will significantly broaden the scope of who will be considered an ERISA fiduciary, potentially exposing many financial services firms to significant obligations and increased liability.

The DOL is currently seeking public comment on the Proposed Rule. The comment period will close on January 20, 2011. To submit a comment, send an e-mail to [email protected] (enter into subject line: Definition of Fiduciary Proposed Rule). Full text of the proposed definition can be found here: http://webapps.dol.gov/FederalRegister/PdfDisplay.aspx?DocId=24328.

For more information about this topic and other legal services, please contact us at (619) 298- 2880, [email protected] or visit www.jackolg.com. Thank you.

JLG works extensively with investment advisers, broker- dealers, investment companies, hedge funds and banks on legal and regulatory compliance matters.

This article is for information purposes and does not contain or convey legal advice. The information herein should not be relied upon in regard to any particular facts or circumstances without first consulting with a lawyer.


1 Department of Labor, Definition of the Term "Fiduciary," 75 Fed. Reg. 204 (proposed Oct. 21, 2010) (to be codified at 29 C.F.R. pt. 2510) [hereinafter, Proposed Rule].

2 Id. at Part B.

3 29 U.S.C.A. § 1002(21)(A) [hereinafter, ERISA].

4 Id.

5 Proposed Rulesupra note 1, at Part B.

6 Id.

7 Id. at Part B, Subpart b. "Conditions."

8 Compare ERISA (c)(1)(ii)(B) with Proposed Rulesupra at note 1, Part B, Subpart b. "Conditions."

9 Proposed Rulesupra at note 1, Part B, Subpart b. "Conditions."

10 Id.

11 Two notable carve outs to the proposed definition are (1) where the retirement plan knows or should know that the service provider is acting averse to the plan's interests, and (2) where the service provider renders "investment education," as described under DOL Interpretative Bulletin 96-1. See 29 CFR § 2509.96-1(e).

About the author

Jacko Law Group provides tailored legal services and effective strategies for success, delivering exemplary solutions to complex legal and regulatory challenges to ensure that both business efforts and compliance obligations are satisfied.

Related Insights