• Home
  • Insights
  • Investment Advisers And Managers Beware: Initial Impacts Of The Financial Reform Act

Form ADV & Disclosure Documents

Investment Advisers And Managers Beware: Initial Impacts Of The Financial Reform Act

Placeholder

On Wednesday, July 21, President Obama signed the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Reform Act”). The Reform Act has an immediate impact on investment advisers, directly affecting both registration requirements and governance of investment managers of hedge funds. Though the new legislation covers a broad array of areas, Jacko Law Group, PC’s (“JLG”) July Legal Tip will focus on four of this week’s ground-breaking areas:

  • The New Definition of “Accredited Investor”
  • Elimination of the Private Adviser Exemption
  • SEC Unanimously Adopts Rules to Redesign Form ADV Part 2
  • Mutual Fund Distribution Fees Rule Proposal

Not only do these monumental changes affect a firm’s registration status under SEC or State governance, the revisions and elimination of once existing exemptions have a direct impact on investors as well. The impact on the financial industry is significant and it remains to be seen whether grace or transition periods will be granted, providing firms time to shift gears and regain compliance with the new regulations.

1. The New Definition of “Accredited Investor”

While most of the provisions of the Reform Act will take effect after some transition period, certain changes to the definition of “accredited investor” under Regulation D take effect immediately. Specifically, the $1 million net worth standard for natural persons to come within the definition of accredited investor must be exclusive of the person’s primary residence. Previously, the net worth calculation included the value of a person’s residence, net of any mortgage. The other provisions of the accredited investor definition remain the same, at least for now, but further changes may be coming as the Reform Act authorizes the SEC to make adjustments to the accredited investor definition as it is applied to natural persons.

Importantly, this new definition will apply to new investors as well as existing investors making additional contributions. Absent further clarification by the SEC, recertification of present investors will not be required.

This change will require any private funds or other issuers engaged in ongoing private offerings that have not yet been completed to revise the Private Placement Memorandum and subscription documents to reflect the new net worth standard. It is prudent for you to contact legal counsel as soon as possible to make the necessary modifications to the definition of “accredited investor,” as the new test must be applied for all new investors and any existing investors that make additional capital contributions. The Act does not provide for a transition period and there is no grandfathering for private offerings already in progress.

2. Elimination of the Private Adviser Exemption

Another change brought about by the Reform Act is the elimination of the “private adviser” exemption under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (“Advisers Act”). That exemption enabled managers to hedge funds and private equity funds to avoid registration if the manager: (1) had fewer than fifteen clients during the prior twelve- month period (with each fund counting as one client); (2) did not hold itself out to the public as an investment adviser (i.e., advertise); and (3) did not advise mutual funds. The new law requires all managers who act as adviser solely to private funds with assets of $150 million or more to register with the SEC.

The rationale for this portion of the Act is to allow the SEC and the States to more fairly allocate responsibilities so there may be closer regulatory scrutiny to focus on the activities of Advisers.

For those advisers to private funds who will be subject to SEC registration requirements, such advisers will be subject to Rule 206(4)-7 under the Advisers Act and the ensuing rigorous compliance requirements therein. Such requirements will include the need to designate a Chief Compliance Officer, adopt and implement compliance policies and procedures, perform annual compliance reviews, and fulfill Form ADV Parts 1 and 2 public filing requirements.

Additionally, the threshold for SEC registration of advisers who provide management or advisory services to other types of clients, such as separate account clients, has now been raised from $25 million to $100 million, effectively placing the responsibility to regulate a significant portion of smaller advisers, including advisers to smaller private funds, on the states.

3. SEC Unanimously Adopts Rules to Redesign Form ADV Part 2

After years of speculation and commentary, the SEC has adopted rules to redesign Form ADV Part 2, the disclosure document provided by investment advisers to clients which describes the adviser’s business practices, investment strategies, fees, conflicts of interest, and much more. The reformat of ADV Part 2 will require a more investor-friendly format that utilizes a “plain English” narrative. In effect, regulators project the new format will provide added protection to investors in comparison to old format, which was primarily a check-the-box form.

In addition to other new requirements, investment advisers will be required to:

  • Present information in a consistent, uniform manner, allowing investors to compare information between advisers;
  • Provide a client with key information about the individual from whom they are receiving advice and contact information for that person’s supervisor, which will appear as a supplement to the brochure;
  • Deliver the brochure to a client before or at the time the adviser enters into an advisory contract with the client;
  • Provide each client an annual summary of material changes to the brochure and either deliver a complete updated brochure or offer to provide the client with the updated brochure; and
  • File both Form ADV Parts 1 and 2 on the IARD system to allow for public access and viewing.

As stated in the official release, “(t)he amended rules and forms will be effective 60 days after publication in the Federal Register. Most investment advisers will begin distributing and publicly posting new brochures in the first quarter of 2011.”1

4. Mutual Fund Distribution Fees Rule Proposal

The SEC has proposed a new rule which will replace Rule 12b-1 under the Investment Company Act of 1940. In effect, the proposed rule will implement new cumulative limits on sales fees that mutual fund companies can charge investors. The fees, commonly known as 12b-1 fees, are paid by fund investors to companies for sales and marketing, and often provide hundreds of millions of dollars to companies.

The effect of the rule will be to:

  • Limit the amount of asset-based sales charges that individual investors pay. In particular, the proposal would restrict these “ongoing sales charges” to the highest fee charged by the fund for shares that have no ongoing sales charge
  • Improve transparency of fees for investors
  • Encourage retail price competition
  • Revise fund director oversight duties

The proposed rule replacing Rule 12b-1 supports underlying principles for transparency in the marketplace as it is “designed to enhance clarity, fairness and competition when investors buy mutual funds.”2

Conclusion

In the proceeding months we expect to see both refinements to the newly implemented rules by the SEC as well as implementation of additional rules. An estimated 100 rules will be proposed in accord with the newly minted Reform Act. JLG is committed to providing legal and compliance updates, support and guidance through this important restructuring time for the financial industry. Please contact us with any questions.

For more information, or to learn about how JLG may be of assistance, please do not hesitate to contact us at (619) 298-2880.

JLG works extensively with investment advisers, broker-dealers, investment companies, hedge funds and banks on legal and regulatory compliance matters. For more information about this topic and other legal services, please contact us at (619) 298-2880, [email protected] or visit jackolg.com. Thank you.

This article is for information purposes and does not contain or convey legal advice. The information herein should not be relied upon in regard to any particular facts or circumstances without first consulting with a lawyer.


1 Press Release, U.S. Sec. & Exch. Comm’n, SEC Approves Disclosure Form Changes to Provide Investors Greater Information About Their Investment Advisers (July 21, 2010), available at http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2010/2010-127.htm.

2 Edward Wyatt, S.E.C. Seeks Mutual Fund Fee Overhaul, N.Y. TIMES, July 22, 2010, at B1, available at http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/22/business/22sec.html?_r=2&ref=business.

About the author

Jacko Law Group provides tailored legal services and effective strategies for success, delivering exemplary solutions to complex legal and regulatory challenges to ensure that both business efforts and compliance obligations are satisfied.

Related Insights

Posted on Google Google
Alan Markfeld profile picture
Alan Markfeld
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Dharmi is an excellent securities lawyer who understands the law as it pertains to these cases. She is extremely proactive and represents her clients well. I highly recommend Jacko and Dharmi.
Posted on Google Google
Danielle Martin profile picture
Danielle Martin
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I’ve had the privilege of working closely with this firm in my role as Chief Compliance Officer and I can confidently say they are an exceptional compliance partner. Their depth of experience is immediately evidentand they bring a level of practical knowledge. What I truly enjoy is their ability to translate complex regulatory requirements into plain English, often using real, everyday examples that make implementation far more manageable. They are also incredibly responsive and reliable. In a field where timing matters, their prompt communication and thoughtful guidance have been invaluable. If you’re looking for a compliance attorney who combines expertise, clarity, and professionalism, I highly recommend them.
Posted on Google Google
Curt Rocca profile picture
Curt Rocca
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Michelle and the team at Jacko Law Group have helped guide through a variety of critical circumstances as we ventured through the uncharted and unfamiliar territory of becoming and successfully operating as an RIA. I have particularly appreciated Michelle's personal involvement and genuine caring about us and our organization. She has been responsive and her counsel has been consistently on-point and helpful. She artfully guided us through our initial filing process and first SEC exam process - which went very well. Very grateful to Michelle and her team.
Posted on Google Google
Nicholas Di Paolo profile picture
Nicholas Di Paolo
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Michelle and her team were excellent to work with, front to back. They helped me to understand the challenges ahead and were always proactive in their consultation through every step of my transition. JLG truly know the wealth management industry very well and did a great job of understanding the challenges unique to my business. Without them, I can confidently say I would not have felt as comfortable through the transition as I did. Fortunately, that's not something that stops there - Michelle and her team have kept in touch to ensure that I'm on top of certain administrative issues, trends, and simply showing me that they care about my business and success. I look forward to continuing to work with them for many years to come.
Posted on Google Google
Margery Neis profile picture
Margery Neis
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Dharmi Mehta was extremely helpful when my business partner and I transitioned to a new RIA firm. She and her staff were all very professional. Her guidance during our transition was invaluable. I highly recommend Dharmi and Jacko Law Group.
Posted on Google Google
Joseph Burwell profile picture
Joseph Burwell
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Dharmi and Amandeep were a delight to work with. They assisted me with a claim and stuck with me the entire way through. Dharmi's advice was invaluable, and I was most impressed by her clear and professional communication. From beginning-to-end, both Dharmi and Amandeep kept me well informed. Their entire team are proud of their work and rightfully so. Thank you!
Posted on Google Google
Faruk Jaffer profile picture
Faruk Jaffer
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
My mentor once told me that a good attorney is worth their weight in gold — and that couldn't be more true of Michelle and Amanda. Their expertise, professionalism, and responsiveness were top notch every step of the way. It's rare to find legal partners who are not only sharp and thorough, but also genuinely invested in your success. I’m grateful for their guidance and highly recommend them to anyone seeking trusted legal counsel.
Posted on Google Google
everistus etafo profile picture
everistus etafo
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
It is my great Privilege to share my Review of what Atty Dharmi Mehta of Jacko Law Group did for me and by extension for my family. From the first time complimentary conversation we had having spoken to several other Lawyers ,l knew she was the right person for the Job .Because of her background as a former RR ,she was professional,kind, Empathetic,listened and was focused on fighting for me. From a potential of been terminated with cause ,l was able to walk away with a clean U5 with a validation that l did nothing wrong except what was in the best Interest of my clients. I hope nobody ever has to go through what l have Experienced, but if you do ,you want Dharmi Mehta beside you .Rest assured your service Deserve 10 stars but this forum only allows 5. Me and my family are forever grateful and will make sure that any RR who needs an advocate will know about you . Everistus Etafo
Posted on Google Google
Karen Althaus profile picture
Karen Althaus
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I have worked with Jacko Law Group for 2 different business situations that necessitated an attorney. In both cases, the team was very thorough & competent. Their attention to our situation and the extra effort they put into our case(s) was very much appreciated. I would highly recommend Jacko Law Group!