Posted on Google Google
Alan Markfeld profile picture
Alan Markfeld
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Dharmi is an excellent securities lawyer who understands the law as it pertains to these cases. She is extremely proactive and represents her clients well. I highly recommend Jacko and Dharmi.
Posted on Google Google
Danielle Martin profile picture
Danielle Martin
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I’ve had the privilege of working closely with this firm in my role as Chief Compliance Officer and I can confidently say they are an exceptional compliance partner. Their depth of experience is immediately evidentand they bring a level of practical knowledge. What I truly enjoy is their ability to translate complex regulatory requirements into plain English, often using real, everyday examples that make implementation far more manageable. They are also incredibly responsive and reliable. In a field where timing matters, their prompt communication and thoughtful guidance have been invaluable. If you’re looking for a compliance attorney who combines expertise, clarity, and professionalism, I highly recommend them.
Posted on Google Google
Curt Rocca profile picture
Curt Rocca
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Michelle and the team at Jacko Law Group have helped guide through a variety of critical circumstances as we ventured through the uncharted and unfamiliar territory of becoming and successfully operating as an RIA. I have particularly appreciated Michelle's personal involvement and genuine caring about us and our organization. She has been responsive and her counsel has been consistently on-point and helpful. She artfully guided us through our initial filing process and first SEC exam process - which went very well. Very grateful to Michelle and her team.
Posted on Google Google
Nicholas Di Paolo profile picture
Nicholas Di Paolo
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Michelle and her team were excellent to work with, front to back. They helped me to understand the challenges ahead and were always proactive in their consultation through every step of my transition. JLG truly know the wealth management industry very well and did a great job of understanding the challenges unique to my business. Without them, I can confidently say I would not have felt as comfortable through the transition as I did. Fortunately, that's not something that stops there - Michelle and her team have kept in touch to ensure that I'm on top of certain administrative issues, trends, and simply showing me that they care about my business and success. I look forward to continuing to work with them for many years to come.
Posted on Google Google
Margery Neis profile picture
Margery Neis
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Dharmi Mehta was extremely helpful when my business partner and I transitioned to a new RIA firm. She and her staff were all very professional. Her guidance during our transition was invaluable. I highly recommend Dharmi and Jacko Law Group.
Posted on Google Google
Joseph Burwell profile picture
Joseph Burwell
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Dharmi and Amandeep were a delight to work with. They assisted me with a claim and stuck with me the entire way through. Dharmi's advice was invaluable, and I was most impressed by her clear and professional communication. From beginning-to-end, both Dharmi and Amandeep kept me well informed. Their entire team are proud of their work and rightfully so. Thank you!
Posted on Google Google
Faruk Jaffer profile picture
Faruk Jaffer
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
My mentor once told me that a good attorney is worth their weight in gold — and that couldn't be more true of Michelle and Amanda. Their expertise, professionalism, and responsiveness were top notch every step of the way. It's rare to find legal partners who are not only sharp and thorough, but also genuinely invested in your success. I’m grateful for their guidance and highly recommend them to anyone seeking trusted legal counsel.
Posted on Google Google
everistus etafo profile picture
everistus etafo
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
It is my great Privilege to share my Review of what Atty Dharmi Mehta of Jacko Law Group did for me and by extension for my family. From the first time complimentary conversation we had having spoken to several other Lawyers ,l knew she was the right person for the Job .Because of her background as a former RR ,she was professional,kind, Empathetic,listened and was focused on fighting for me. From a potential of been terminated with cause ,l was able to walk away with a clean U5 with a validation that l did nothing wrong except what was in the best Interest of my clients. I hope nobody ever has to go through what l have Experienced, but if you do ,you want Dharmi Mehta beside you .Rest assured your service Deserve 10 stars but this forum only allows 5. Me and my family are forever grateful and will make sure that any RR who needs an advocate will know about you . Everistus Etafo
Posted on Google Google
Karen Althaus profile picture
Karen Althaus
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I have worked with Jacko Law Group for 2 different business situations that necessitated an attorney. In both cases, the team was very thorough & competent. Their attention to our situation and the extra effort they put into our case(s) was very much appreciated. I would highly recommend Jacko Law Group!
  • Home
  • Insights
  • SEC New Private Fund Adviser Rule: What You Need to Know

Investment Adviser Regulatory Counsel (SEC & State)

SEC New Private Fund Adviser Rule: What You Need to Know

Portrait photo of Miles Edwards | Jacko Law Group, PC

 

Introduction
On February 9, 2022, the Securities and Exchange Commission voted to propose new rules to “enhance” the regulation of private fund advisers by increasing “transparency, competition, and efficiency.[1] The proposed rules were not entirely unexpected, but their substance and implications appeared to target the fundamental elements of the private funds and disrupt the relationships with investors. Specifically, the proposal included prohibitions for private fund advisers, whether registered with the SEC or not, from providing certain types of preferential treatment to investors in their funds and all other preferential treatment unless it is disclosed to current and prospective investors.”[2]

The Proposal’s War on Side Letters and Most Favored Nations Clause
This statement though benign on its face, is a direct assault to the heart and soul of the private funds’ contractual relationship with their investors via “Side Letters” and the Most Favored Nations Clauses (“MFN”). The use of side letters by private funds has become ubiquitous since they modify the terms of the governing partnership agreement and typically are memorialized in a letter executed by the fund’s General Partner. Side Letters have always been viewed as an “inducement” for potential investing Limited Partners since it grants them special rights and privileges, including early exits and redemptions, lower management and performance fees and in some cases, ad hoc reporting. The Side Letter usually is reserved for investors who are willing to make large capital commitments and the General Partner usually is more than willing to accommodate.

It’s not completely one-sided since the accommodations may be advantageous to other Limited Partners. Many prospective Limited Partners will negotiate for a MFN provision that permits the election of certain benefits negotiated by, and granted to, other limited partners via a Side Letter. The prospective Limited Partner will ask for the best deal; i.e., they want the most preferential terms already handed by Side Letter to other Limited Partners.

Comment Letters Reflected Varying Perspectives
The Comments Letters[3] received on this proposal were voluminous and varied. Over a hundred letters were received and were divided in several factions; United State Senators and Representatives strongly supported the new rules and hailed them as “reforms,” while the Attorneys General of several states[4] derided the proposals because, “these rules impose burdensome requirements on regulated companies and will ultimately harm investors and all Americans.”[5] The Fund industry opinioned through comment letters submitted by the Institutional Limited Partners Association arguing that Limited Partners are “sophisticated investors” and can negotiate for themselves, and the GPs say the rules are unnecessary.”[6] Following these comments, letters were submitted by State and Union Pension Funds, Law School Professors, Funds and a fair number of investors.

Taking these varying views into consideration, the SEC staff released the New Private Fund Rule on August 23, 2023.  

In this month’s Risk Management Tip, we will explore the reforms that are triggered by the New Private Fund  Rule. We believe that these changes will have a profound impact on the day-to-day operations of Private Fund Advisers.  We will summarize the requirements as set forth by the Rule, and set forth the effective date for each of these areas.

Summary of the New Private Fund Rule

Quarterly Statements: Rule 211(h)(1)-2

Requires registered private fund advisers to provide investors with quarterly statements including information about fund performance, fees, and expenses. The quarterly statements must include a Fund table that includes all compensation and fees provided to the Adviser and fees and expenses paid by the Fund.

Effective Date: 18 months after date of publication in the Federal Register.

Private Fund Audit Rule: Rule 206(4)-10
Requires a registered private fund adviser to obtain an annual audit of the financial statements of any private fund it manages and to distribute them to investors in the private fund promptly after completion of the audit. The audit would need to be performed by an independent accountant registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. The Audit Rule a written agreement between the adviser or the private fund and the auditor, pursuant to which the auditor would be required to notify the SEC’s Division of Examinations upon the auditor’s termination or issuance of a modified opinion (Auditor Notification Requirement). 

Effective Date: 18 months after date of publication in the Federal Register.

Prohibited Activities: Rule 211(h)2-1
This Rule prohibits an investment adviser to a private fund, directly or indirectly, from engaging in certain activities with respect to the private fund or any investor in that private fund, including: charging certain fees and expenses to the fund including accelerated monitoring fees; fees or expenses associated with an examination or investigation of the adviser or its related persons by governmental or regulatory authorities and  borrowing money, securities, or other fund assets, or receiving an extension of credit, from a private fund client.

The Rule’s most controversial provision prohibits agreements with limited partners that contain language Seeking reimbursement, indemnification, exculpation, or limitation of its liability by the private fund or its investors for a breach of fiduciary duty, willful misfeasance, bad faith, negligence, or recklessness in providing services to the private fund.

Effective Date: 12 months after date of publication in the Federal Register.

Secondary Transaction Fairness/Valuation Opinion: Rule 211(h)2-2
Requires registered private fund advisers, in connection with an adviser-led secondary transaction, to obtain and distribute to investors a fairness opinion or a valuation opinion and a written summary of certain material relationships between the adviser and the opinion provider. The SEC reasons that this Rule is designed to provide an important check against an adviser’s conflicts of interest in structuring and leading a transaction from which it may stand to profit at the expense of private fund investors.

Effective Date: 12 months after date of publication in the Federal Register.

The No “Side letters” or “Preferential Treatment”: Rule 211(h)(2)-3
Prohibits a private fund adviser from side letters that offer redemption terms that “may have a material, negative effect on other investors” and providing reporting and information that the other Fund investors may not receive. The SEC wants a level playing field for all investors and the Rule states we are “prohibiting advisers from providing preferential treatment to any investor in a private fund” unless the adviser provides written disclosures to prospective and current investors in the private fund regarding all preferential treatment the adviser or its related persons provided to other investors in the same fund.

Effective Date: 12 months after date of publication in the Federal Register.

Annual Review: Rule 206(4)-7(b)
Requires all registered advisers, including those that do not advise private funds, to document the annual review of their compliance policies and procedures in writing. The Rule does not enumerate specific elements that advisers must include in the written documentation of their annual review. This SEC guidance does comport with their principle-based rule system, though advisers, we believe, may be more careful as to the content of their reviews or try to classify as attorney-client privilege to shield it from closer regulatory scrutiny.

Effective Date: 60 days after date of publication in the Federal Register.

Conclusion
Advisers (registered or not) need to review these new rules and their current Policies and Procedures to determine the impact on their firms. Advisers considering forming new Private Funds should incorporate these Rules for their new offering. Most of the rules are effective between 12 – 18 months of being published in the Federal register, however, special consideration should be given to the Annual Review Rule which becomes effective 60 days after the date of publication in the Federal Register. Exempt Reporting Advisers (“ERAs”) and other unregistered advisers are not affected by the Quarterly Statement Rule, the Private Fund Audit Rule, the Adviser-Led Secondaries Rule, or the Compliance Rule Amendment.

Jacko Law Group provides counsel to private fund advisers and can assist in performing your Annual Review.  For more information and to explore how the new Private Fund Rule will impact your organization, please call us at 619.298.2880.

 

[1] https://www.sec.gov/news/press-release/2022-19.

[2] Ibid.

[3] Comments on Private Fund Advisers; Documentation of Registered Investment Adviser Compliance Review, https://www.sec.gov/comments/s7-03-22/s70322.htm.

[4] The States of Montana, Louisiana, Alabama, Mississippi, Alaska, Ohio, Arizona, Oklahoma, Arkansas, South Carolina, Georgia, South Dakota, Indiana, Texas, Kansas, Utah. Kentucky, and West Virgina signed the October 24. 2022 comment letter.

[5] https://www.sec.gov/comments/s7-32-10/s73210-20147444-313668.pdf.

[6] https://www.sec.gov/comments/s7-26-22/s72622-20165136-334499.pdf

About the author

Jacko Law Group provides tailored legal services and effective strategies for success, delivering exemplary solutions to complex legal and regulatory challenges to ensure that both business efforts and compliance obligations are satisfied.

Related Insights