• Home
  • Insights
  • How The Proposed Amendments To Form ADV And Advisers Act Will Impact Investment Advisers

Form ADV & Disclosure Documents

How The Proposed Amendments To Form ADV And Advisers Act Will Impact Investment Advisers

Placeholder

The Form ADV is one of the most important documents compiled by an investment adviser. Not only does it serve as the adviser’s client disclosure brochure to unveil important information related to the firm’s products and service offerings, fees, business practices and related conflicts of interest, but it also serves as a critical tool for the SEC’s regulatory program for measuring and analyzing risk for its registrants.

On May 20, 2015, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC” or the “Commission”) issued Release No. IA-4091 (the “Release”), which proposes certain amendments to Form ADV in order to obtain additional data related to an adviser’s business practices in three broad areas: obtaining information related to separately managed accounts (“SMAs”); streamlining reporting obligations for related advisers to multiple private funds; and amendments clarifying the reporting obligations intended for Form ADV Part 1.1

In addition, the Release also seeks to amend the Investment Advisers Act of 19402 to include new provisions relating to rule 204-2, the books and records rule,3 which would require registrants to maintain certain performance backup documentation for and written communications relating to performance information presented and circulated by the adviser. With these heightened requirements, it is the Commission’s intent to help deter fraudulent performance claims, thereby offering better protections for investors.

This month’s Legal Tip highlights some of the most important aspects of the proposed amendments and provides guidance on what comments the Commission seeks.

Proposed Amendments to Form ADV

In an effort to gather more meaningful data to help investors assess an investment adviser and the Commission to monitor industry trends and conduct risk analytics, the SEC is proposing amendments to the following areas.

A. New Information Requests for SMAs

Several of the proposed amendments relate directly to SMAs. For purposes of this amendment, the SEC defines an SMA as “advisory accounts other than those that are pooled investment vehicles.”4 New information required to be reported would include:

  • Types of SMA assets held;
  • Data on SMA regulatory assets under management and the types of accounts5 that comprise those assets;
  • Use of derivatives and borrowings in SMAs; and
  • Information relating to those custodians who custody over 10% of the adviser’s SMA business.

Notably, dependent upon the response provided by the adviser, there could be differing reporting obligations based upon, for example, the regulatory assets under management reported.6 The SEC is seeking comments on reporting frequency (i.e., more than on an annual basis) and the thresholds proposed for such reporting.

B. Additional Information Relating to the Investment Adviser and Its Business

The SEC also is proposing to expand its reporting questions within Form ADV Part 1 to include questions related to an adviser’s identification, business and affiliations. This includes the following:

  • Providing all Central Index Key (“CIK”) numbers if there is more than one;
  • Reporting all social media platform websites7 currently in use by the adviser;
  • Additional information relating to offices other than the adviser’s principal office;8
  • Whether the Chief Compliance Officer is associated with or compensated by someone other than the adviser;9
  • Reporting company assets within a range;
  • Expanding Item 5 to include new client information relating to number of clients and amount of regulatory assets under management for each category of client;
  • Reporting on the number of clients where the registrant performed an advisory activity but does not have regulatory assets under management;
  • Notating if regulatory assets under management reported on Form ADV Part 1A differs from the client assets under management reported on Form ADV Part 2A;
  • Reporting regulatory assets under management attributable to non-U.S. clients;
  • Providing the regulatory assets under management for each managed account related to an investment company or business development company advised by the registrant; and
  • Reporting the regulatory assets under management attributable to the adviser serving as a portfolio manager or sponsor to a wrap fee program.

Additional information also is being sought related to the identifying numbers of an adviser’s financial industry affiliations and service providers, such as Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) registration numbers and CIK numbers as well as the percentage of private fund clients who are qualified clients.10

The SEC is seeking comments on the usefulness of such data to investors and the concerns of and burden placed on advisers for providing this information.

C. Availability of Umbrella Registration for Certain Private Fund Advisers

Through amendment of the filing requirements for private fund advisers who are controlled by or under common control with a primary filing adviser, the SEC intends to streamline the reporting process by using an “umbrella registration” technique wherein there would be only one registration filing required for the advisory business. In order to qualify for the umbrella registration, a series of conditions must be met. This includes:

  • The filing adviser and each relying adviser must only advise private funds and clients in SMAs that are qualified clients;
  • The filing adviser must have its principal office in the U.S., thus subjecting the filing adviser and each relying adviser to the provisions of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940;
  • The relying adviser must be associated with and supervised by the filing adviser;
  • The relying adviser is subject to SEC examinations; and
  • The filing adviser and each relying adviser operates under a single code of ethics11 and written policies and procedures manual.12

In addition, as proposed, Form ADV Part 1A would include new identifying information related to the relying adviser, including the relying adviser’s address, CRD and other unique identifier numbers, basis for SEC registration and ownership information.

The SEC is seeking comments on the usefulness of umbrella registration and whether the Commission should amend Form ADV to accommodate for such umbrella registration.

D. Clarifying Amendments to Form ADV Part 1A

Finally, there are a number of proposed amendments to Form ADV Part 1A that are designed to clarify the type of data sought by the Commission for advisory filings. This includes:

  • Item 2 – specifying SEC registration eligibility for “newly formed advisers”;
  • Item 4 – succession by amendment filings;
  • Item 7 – information about financial industry affiliations and advisement to private funds;
  • Item 8 – clarifying the types of participation and interest the adviser expects to engage in during the year;
  • Section 9.C. of Schedule D – information about independent public accountants that perform surprise examinations in connection with the custody rule; and
  • Disclosure Reporting Pages – relating to disciplinary reporting for both registered and exempt reporting advisers.

For more information, including proposed changes to the instructions and glossary related to these areas, please refer to pages 35-44 of the Release.

Proposed Amendments to the Books and Records Rules – Maintenance of Performance Information

Many investment advisers have enacted internal controls whereby the firm routinely maintains backup records to support performance numbers presented within their marketing collateral. The Commission is now proposing amendments to rule 204-2 requiring mandatory maintenance of all materials “that demonstrate the calculation of the performance or rate of return in any communication that the adviser circulates or distributes, directly or indirectly, to any person.”13 This means that supporting materials to performance claims communicated to just one person would need to be maintained.

Moreover, under the proposal, advisers also would be required to maintain originals of all written communications sent or received by the adviser relating to performance or rate of return of any or all managed accounts or securities recommendations.14 Given the fact that performance advertising continues to be an area where the Commission continues to find deficiencies during its examinations, it appears to be the staff’s hope that requiring this additional information will help to mitigate against misleading advertising claims.

Conclusion

Based on our clients’ business models, many of these proposals will have a material impact on their compliance programs. Consequently, investment advisers are strongly encouraged to review the Release and consider submitting comments related to these proposed changes, taking into consideration the types and amount of information that will be required to be reported.

Comments to the proposed rules can be submitted via form, by sending an email to rule- [email protected] or by accessing the Federal eRulemaking Portal online. Comments must be submitted no later than 60 days after publication in the Federal Register. For more information on submitted comments to the proposed rules, see https://www.sec.gov/rules/proposed/2015/ia-4091.pdf.

For more information on the proposed rule changes and to evaluate how they may impact your advisory firm, please contact us at (619) 298-2880 or at [email protected].

Author: Michelle L. Jacko, Esq., Managing Partner, Jacko Law Group, PC. JLG works extensively with investment advisers, broker-dealers, investment companies, hedge funds, banks and corporate clients on securities and corporate counsel matters.

This article is for information purposes and does not contain or convey legal advice. The information herein should not be relied upon in regard to any particular facts or circumstances without first consulting with a lawyer.


1 See https://www.sec.gov/about/forms/formadv-part1a.pdf.

2 See https://www.sec.gov/about/laws/iaa40.pdf.

3 See https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/17/275.204-2.

4 A pooled investment vehicle would include registered investment companies, business development companies and pooled investment vehicles that are not investment companies, such as private funds.

5 Among other things, collection of this data could help in better understanding whether an adviser specializes in particular asset classes.

6 For example, advisers with at least $10 billion in regulatory assets under management reported for SMAs would have to update certain data on Form ADV Part 1A on both a mid-year and year-end basis. For more information, see page 10 of the Release.

7 Social media platforms include, for example, Twitter, Facebook and LinkedIn.

8 Information collected would include the total number of offices and information about the 25 largest offices based on number of employees. These largest offices would provide additional information on the office’s CRD branch number, number of employees performing advisory functions and business activities conducted from that office.

For more information, see page 18 of the Release.

9 Among other things, this data could be useful in helping to identify outsourced chief compliance officers for purposes of assessing potential risks.

10 A “qualified client” is defined in rule 205-3 as a natural person who or a company that (1) immediately after entering into the contract, has at least $1,000,000 under the management of the investment adviser; (2) the investment adviser entering into the contract (and any person acting on his behalf) reasonably believes, immediately prior to entering into the contract, either: (a) has a net worth (together, in the case of a natural person, with assets held jointly with a spouse) of more than $2,000,000 at the time the contract is entered into; or (b) is a qualified purchaser as defined in section 2(a)(51)(A) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 at the time the contract is entered into; or (3) a natural person who immediately prior to entering into the contract is: (a) an executive officer, director, trustee, general partner, or person serving in a similar capacity, of the investment adviser; or (b) an employee of the investment adviser (other than an employee performing solely clerical, secretarial or administrative functions with regard to the investment adviser) who, in connection with his or her regular functions or duties, participates in the investment activities of such investment adviser, provided that such employee has been performing such functions and duties for or on behalf of the investment adviser, or substantially similar functions or duties for or on behalf of another company for at least 12 months.

11 For more information, see rule 204A-1.

12 For more information, see rule 206(4)-7.

13 See page 45 of the Release.

14 Id.

About the author

Managing Partner and CEO

Michelle L. Jacko, Esq. is the Managing Partner and CEO of Jacko Law Group, PC (“JLG”), which offers securities, corporate, real estate, and employment law counsel to broker-dealers, investment advise...

Related Insights

Posted on Google Google
Alan Markfeld profile picture
Alan Markfeld
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Dharmi is an excellent securities lawyer who understands the law as it pertains to these cases. She is extremely proactive and represents her clients well. I highly recommend Jacko and Dharmi.
Posted on Google Google
Danielle Martin profile picture
Danielle Martin
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I’ve had the privilege of working closely with this firm in my role as Chief Compliance Officer and I can confidently say they are an exceptional compliance partner. Their depth of experience is immediately evidentand they bring a level of practical knowledge. What I truly enjoy is their ability to translate complex regulatory requirements into plain English, often using real, everyday examples that make implementation far more manageable. They are also incredibly responsive and reliable. In a field where timing matters, their prompt communication and thoughtful guidance have been invaluable. If you’re looking for a compliance attorney who combines expertise, clarity, and professionalism, I highly recommend them.
Posted on Google Google
Curt Rocca profile picture
Curt Rocca
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Michelle and the team at Jacko Law Group have helped guide through a variety of critical circumstances as we ventured through the uncharted and unfamiliar territory of becoming and successfully operating as an RIA. I have particularly appreciated Michelle's personal involvement and genuine caring about us and our organization. She has been responsive and her counsel has been consistently on-point and helpful. She artfully guided us through our initial filing process and first SEC exam process - which went very well. Very grateful to Michelle and her team.
Posted on Google Google
Nicholas Di Paolo profile picture
Nicholas Di Paolo
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Michelle and her team were excellent to work with, front to back. They helped me to understand the challenges ahead and were always proactive in their consultation through every step of my transition. JLG truly know the wealth management industry very well and did a great job of understanding the challenges unique to my business. Without them, I can confidently say I would not have felt as comfortable through the transition as I did. Fortunately, that's not something that stops there - Michelle and her team have kept in touch to ensure that I'm on top of certain administrative issues, trends, and simply showing me that they care about my business and success. I look forward to continuing to work with them for many years to come.
Posted on Google Google
Margery Neis profile picture
Margery Neis
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Dharmi Mehta was extremely helpful when my business partner and I transitioned to a new RIA firm. She and her staff were all very professional. Her guidance during our transition was invaluable. I highly recommend Dharmi and Jacko Law Group.
Posted on Google Google
Joseph Burwell profile picture
Joseph Burwell
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Dharmi and Amandeep were a delight to work with. They assisted me with a claim and stuck with me the entire way through. Dharmi's advice was invaluable, and I was most impressed by her clear and professional communication. From beginning-to-end, both Dharmi and Amandeep kept me well informed. Their entire team are proud of their work and rightfully so. Thank you!
Posted on Google Google
Faruk Jaffer profile picture
Faruk Jaffer
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
My mentor once told me that a good attorney is worth their weight in gold — and that couldn't be more true of Michelle and Amanda. Their expertise, professionalism, and responsiveness were top notch every step of the way. It's rare to find legal partners who are not only sharp and thorough, but also genuinely invested in your success. I’m grateful for their guidance and highly recommend them to anyone seeking trusted legal counsel.
Posted on Google Google
everistus etafo profile picture
everistus etafo
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
It is my great Privilege to share my Review of what Atty Dharmi Mehta of Jacko Law Group did for me and by extension for my family. From the first time complimentary conversation we had having spoken to several other Lawyers ,l knew she was the right person for the Job .Because of her background as a former RR ,she was professional,kind, Empathetic,listened and was focused on fighting for me. From a potential of been terminated with cause ,l was able to walk away with a clean U5 with a validation that l did nothing wrong except what was in the best Interest of my clients. I hope nobody ever has to go through what l have Experienced, but if you do ,you want Dharmi Mehta beside you .Rest assured your service Deserve 10 stars but this forum only allows 5. Me and my family are forever grateful and will make sure that any RR who needs an advocate will know about you . Everistus Etafo
Posted on Google Google
Karen Althaus profile picture
Karen Althaus
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I have worked with Jacko Law Group for 2 different business situations that necessitated an attorney. In both cases, the team was very thorough & competent. Their attention to our situation and the extra effort they put into our case(s) was very much appreciated. I would highly recommend Jacko Law Group!