• Home
  • Insights
  • Lift On General Solicitation Restrictions For Certain Private Funds

Legal Risk Management Tips

Lift On General Solicitation Restrictions For Certain Private Funds

Placeholder
As discussed in last April's Legal Tip, the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act ("JOBS Act"), signed into law on April 5, 2012, is legislation designed to reduce the costs of going public and to facilitate increased capital formation. While the JOBS Act focuses primarily on easing restrictions for small companies seeking to raise capital, it also modifies various rules affecting private funds and their managers, primarily by lifting the advertising and marketing restrictions of Regulation D under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"). General Solicitation and Advertising In general, issuers of securities in the U.S. may not make an offering of securities without filing a registration statement under the Securities Act, unless there is an applicable exemption1. Managers of private funds, in selling the funds' securities to raise capital, commonly rely on the exemption from registration provided by Rule 506 of Regulation D promulgated under the Securities Act, which allows for the offering of securities primarily to "accredited investors"2 so long as such offering is not accomplished through general solicitation or advertising. This prohibition against general solicitation and advertising restricts fund managers from utilizing articles, advertisements, seminars, meetings or notices (whether in a newspaper, periodical, magazine, television, radio, Internet or social media) to promote their offering. It also generally means that the fund manager must have a "pre-existing relationship" with each potential investor in the new fund before offering a fund interest to such potential investor. Changes to Rule 506 under Regulation D The JOBS Act requires the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") to adopt amendments to Rule 506 so that the prohibitions against general solicitation and advertising will not apply to the offer and sale of securities pursuant to Rule 506, provided that all purchasers of the securities are accredited investors and the fund manager has taken reasonable steps to verify that all purchasers are accredited investors.3 The JOBS Act also appears to provide that under the new amendments to Rule 506, funds engaging in general solicitation or advertising will not be deemed to be making a public offering under the federal securities laws, subject certain factors. Accordingly, private funds relying on either Section 3(c)(1) or Section 3(c)(7) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the "1940 Act") should be able to engage in general solicitation or advertising without violating the provisions contained in those sections regulating "public offerings" of securities, so that the fund can remain exempt from registration as an investment company.4 Private funds that are exempt commodity pools under Commodities Futures Trading Commission ("CFTC") regulations should note that existing CFTC rules limit the offer or sale of interests to the public, and it appears that the JOBS Act has not amended those provisions. Impact on Private Funds and Further Considerations Once the SEC issues the amendments to Rule 506, fund managers will be permitted to market their funds through print, broadcast, Internet or social media advertisements, notices posted on their websites, media interviews, presentations at seminars, and other forms of broad-based interaction with potential investors. In addition, fund managers will likely no longer be required to have a "pre-existing relationship" with potential investors in their fund. Private fund managers should keep in mind, however, that any such advertisements or solicitations will still be subject to the anti-fraud provisions of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and the rules promulgated thereunder, which include (in the case of registered investment advisers), prohibitions against the use of testimonials and specific requirements when listing past performance information in connection with the offer and sale of private fund securities and the investment activities of private funds. Furthermore, as with any offering of securities, fund managers will remain subject to the anti-fraud provisions contained in Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder. Although the elimination of the general solicitation and advertising restriction is a welcome change by many, it is not formally effective until the final rule from the SEC is issued. While the JOBS Act gave the SEC until earlier this month to amend Rule 506, in her June 28, 2012, testimony before the U.S. House Subcommittee on TARP, Financial Services and Bailouts of Public and Private Programs Oversight and Government Reform Committee, SEC Chairman Mary L. Shapiro told lawmakers the agency would not be able to meet that deadline.5 She stated in part, "...the 90 day deadline does not provide a realistic timeframe for the drafting of the new rule, the preparation of an accompanying economic analysis, the proper review by the Commission, and an opportunity for public input." As reported in JLG's July 13, 2012 blog6, Chairman Shapiro did not give any specific dates as to when the proposed rulemaking lifting the general solicitation ban would be issued, but indicated the SEC would be in a position to act in the near future. Conclusion Until the SEC amends Rule 506, the current rules prohibiting general solicitations and advertising remain in place and private funds should not make any changes to their current practices. However, once final rules from the SEC are issued, private funds and their managers are advised to review their fund documents, including subscription documents, to ensure that they are consistent with the changes effected by the JOBS Act. For additional information about the JOBS Act and the potential impact to private funds, please contact us at [email protected], or (619) 298-2880. JLG works extensively with investment advisers, broker-dealers, investment companies, hedge funds, private equity firms, banks and financial professionals on securities and corporate law regulatory matters. This article is for information purposes and does not contain or convey legal advice. The information herein should not be relied upon in regard to any particular facts or circumstances without first consulting with a lawyer.
1 15 U.S.C. §77e; See also 15 U.S.C. §77c-d. 2 Rule 506 also allows a limited number of non-accredited investors, although this provision is seldom used by private funds (due in large part to the detailed disclosure requirements for non-accredited investors). 3 Note that it is unclear whether merely obtaining representations from purchasers through questionnaires or subscription agreements that they are accredited investors will constitute "reasonable steps" under the amended Rule 506, or whether additional steps to verify their accredited investor status will be required. 4 While the JOBS Act does not specifically amend the 1940 Act, new Section 4(b) of the Securities Act provides that offers and sales under Rule 506 shall not be deemed public offerings under the federal securities laws as a result of general solicitation or advertising. 5 Shapiro's speech may be found in its entirety at http://www.sec.gov/news/testimony/2012/ts062812mls.htm. 6 See http://jackolg.wordpress.com/.

About the author

Jacko Law Group provides tailored legal services and effective strategies for success, delivering exemplary solutions to complex legal and regulatory challenges to ensure that both business efforts and compliance obligations are satisfied.

Related Insights

Posted on Google Google
Alan Markfeld profile picture
Alan Markfeld
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Dharmi is an excellent securities lawyer who understands the law as it pertains to these cases. She is extremely proactive and represents her clients well. I highly recommend Jacko and Dharmi.
Posted on Google Google
Danielle Martin profile picture
Danielle Martin
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I’ve had the privilege of working closely with this firm in my role as Chief Compliance Officer and I can confidently say they are an exceptional compliance partner. Their depth of experience is immediately evidentand they bring a level of practical knowledge. What I truly enjoy is their ability to translate complex regulatory requirements into plain English, often using real, everyday examples that make implementation far more manageable. They are also incredibly responsive and reliable. In a field where timing matters, their prompt communication and thoughtful guidance have been invaluable. If you’re looking for a compliance attorney who combines expertise, clarity, and professionalism, I highly recommend them.
Posted on Google Google
Curt Rocca profile picture
Curt Rocca
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Michelle and the team at Jacko Law Group have helped guide through a variety of critical circumstances as we ventured through the uncharted and unfamiliar territory of becoming and successfully operating as an RIA. I have particularly appreciated Michelle's personal involvement and genuine caring about us and our organization. She has been responsive and her counsel has been consistently on-point and helpful. She artfully guided us through our initial filing process and first SEC exam process - which went very well. Very grateful to Michelle and her team.
Posted on Google Google
Nicholas Di Paolo profile picture
Nicholas Di Paolo
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Michelle and her team were excellent to work with, front to back. They helped me to understand the challenges ahead and were always proactive in their consultation through every step of my transition. JLG truly know the wealth management industry very well and did a great job of understanding the challenges unique to my business. Without them, I can confidently say I would not have felt as comfortable through the transition as I did. Fortunately, that's not something that stops there - Michelle and her team have kept in touch to ensure that I'm on top of certain administrative issues, trends, and simply showing me that they care about my business and success. I look forward to continuing to work with them for many years to come.
Posted on Google Google
Margery Neis profile picture
Margery Neis
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Dharmi Mehta was extremely helpful when my business partner and I transitioned to a new RIA firm. She and her staff were all very professional. Her guidance during our transition was invaluable. I highly recommend Dharmi and Jacko Law Group.
Posted on Google Google
Joseph Burwell profile picture
Joseph Burwell
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Dharmi and Amandeep were a delight to work with. They assisted me with a claim and stuck with me the entire way through. Dharmi's advice was invaluable, and I was most impressed by her clear and professional communication. From beginning-to-end, both Dharmi and Amandeep kept me well informed. Their entire team are proud of their work and rightfully so. Thank you!
Posted on Google Google
Faruk Jaffer profile picture
Faruk Jaffer
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
My mentor once told me that a good attorney is worth their weight in gold — and that couldn't be more true of Michelle and Amanda. Their expertise, professionalism, and responsiveness were top notch every step of the way. It's rare to find legal partners who are not only sharp and thorough, but also genuinely invested in your success. I’m grateful for their guidance and highly recommend them to anyone seeking trusted legal counsel.
Posted on Google Google
everistus etafo profile picture
everistus etafo
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
It is my great Privilege to share my Review of what Atty Dharmi Mehta of Jacko Law Group did for me and by extension for my family. From the first time complimentary conversation we had having spoken to several other Lawyers ,l knew she was the right person for the Job .Because of her background as a former RR ,she was professional,kind, Empathetic,listened and was focused on fighting for me. From a potential of been terminated with cause ,l was able to walk away with a clean U5 with a validation that l did nothing wrong except what was in the best Interest of my clients. I hope nobody ever has to go through what l have Experienced, but if you do ,you want Dharmi Mehta beside you .Rest assured your service Deserve 10 stars but this forum only allows 5. Me and my family are forever grateful and will make sure that any RR who needs an advocate will know about you . Everistus Etafo
Posted on Google Google
Karen Althaus profile picture
Karen Althaus
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I have worked with Jacko Law Group for 2 different business situations that necessitated an attorney. In both cases, the team was very thorough & competent. Their attention to our situation and the extra effort they put into our case(s) was very much appreciated. I would highly recommend Jacko Law Group!