• Home
  • Insights
  • SEC Adopts Rules Which Overhaul The Investment Adviser Regulatory Framework

Investment Adviser Regulatory Counsel (SEC & State)

SEC Adopts Rules Which Overhaul The Investment Adviser Regulatory Framework

Placeholder

At an open meeting held on June 22, 2011 Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC” or the “Commission”) adopted new rules and rule amendments under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended, (the “Advisers Act”) that, among other things, increase the statutory threshold for registration by investment advisers with the SEC, define “venture capital fund” and provide an exemption from registration for advisers with less than $150 million in private fund assets under management.1 This Legal Tip will provide an overview of the SEC’s recently adopted rules and outline the transition process for those advisers who will be required to switch from SEC to state registration.

A. New $100 Million Threshold for SEC Registration

Previously, the Advisers Act prohibited an investment adviser from registering with the SEC unless it has at least $25 million of assets under management. The newly adopted rules create a category of “mid-sized advisers”- i.e., those that have between $25 million and $100 million of assets under management – and shift primary responsibility for their regulatory oversight to the states. This is accomplished by generally prohibiting mid-sized advisers from registering or remaining registered with the SEC. The SEC estimates that approximately 3,200 SEC-registered advisers will be required to withdraw their registrations and register with one or more state securities authorities. To that end, the SEC has provided new rules for what it termed an “orderly transition” to state registration for mid-sized advisers that will no longer be eligible to register or remain registered with the Commission.

1. “The Switch” to State Registration

The rules governing the switch from SEC to state registration differ depending on whether the investment adviser is an existing SEC registrant or is applying for SEC registration for the first time.

  • Existing SEC Registrants. Under the rule, each adviser registered with the SEC on January 1, 2012 must file an amendment to its Form ADV no later than March 30, 2012. These amendments will respond to new items in Form ADV and will identify mid-sized advisers no longer eligible to remain registered with the Commission. Mid-sized advisers that are no longer eligible for SEC registration must withdraw their registrations by filing Form ADV-W no later than June 28, 2012. Mid-sized advisers registered with the Commission as of July 21, 2011 must remain registered with the Commission until January 1, 2012.
  • New Applicants. Until July 21, 2011, advisers applying for registration with the SEC that are mid-sized advisers may register with either the Commission or the appropriate state securities authority. After July 21, 2011, all mid-sized advisers are prohibited from registering with the Commission and must register with the appropriate state securities authorities.

The SEC also stated that the deadline for mid-sized advisers switching from SEC to state registration was selected because the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) had not prepared the IARD system to accommodate the switch, and in fact would not begin updating the IARD system until November 2011.

Please note that advisers that have assets under management of $100 million or more will continue to register with the SEC (unless an exemption from registration is available).

B. The New “Exempt Reporting Advisers”

The Dodd-Frank Act amends the Advisers Act, as of July 21, 2011, to create two new exemptions from registration for advisers to certain types of private funds and repeal the private adviser exemption, on which many advisers to hedge and other private funds previously relied on in order to avoid registration. The two new exemptions apply to: (1) investment advisers that are solely advisers to “venture capital funds,” and (2) advisers that act solely as advisers to private funds that have assets under management (“AUM”) in the United States of less than $150 million. While both of these types of advisers are deemed to be “exempt reporting advisers,” they still must file certain reports, such as the proposed Form PF, and a truncated version of Form ADV with the SEC through the IARD system.2

Notably, advisers relying on either one of these exemptions to avoid registration with the SEC may still have to register as investment advisers with applicable state securities regulators.

1. Exemption for Advisers Solely to Venture Capital Funds

The newly adopted rule defines a venture capital fund as a private fund that:

  • Holds no more than twenty percent of the fund’s capital commitments in non-qualifying investments3;
  • Does not borrow or otherwise incur leverage, other than limited short-term borrowing;
  • Does not offer its investors redemption or other similar liquidity rights except in extraordinary circumstances;
  • Represents itself as pursuing a venture capital strategy to its investors and prospective investors; and
  • Is not registered under the Investment Company Act and has not elected to be treated as a business development company.4

An adviser is eligible to rely on the venture capital exemption only if it solely advises venture capital funds that meet all of the elements of the above definition.5

2. The Private Fund Adviser Exemption

Under the newly adopted rules, the SEC exempts from registration any investment adviser solely to private funds that has less than $150 million in AUM in the United States. The Advisers Act defines the term “private fund” as an issuer that would be an investment company, as defined in section of the Investment Company Act of 1940 but for section 3(c)(1) or 3(c)(7) of that Act. The SEC has coined this new exemption the “private fund adviser exemption.”

An adviser that has one or more clients that are not private funds is not eligible for this exemption and must register unless another exemption is available. Consequently, advisers relying on this exemption must solely advise private funds. An adviser may, however, advise an unlimited number of private funds provided that the aggregate value of the assets of the private funds is less than $150 million. Accordingly, advisers to private funds must aggregate the value of all fund assets in order to determine if the adviser is below the $150 million threshold.

For more information about this topic and other legal services, please contact us at (619) 298-2880, [email protected] or visit jackolg.com. Thank you.

JLG works extensively with investment advisers, broker-dealers, investment companies, hedge funds and banks on legal and regulatory compliance matters.

This article is for information purposes and does not contain or convey legal advice. The information herein should not be relied upon in regard to any particular facts or circumstances without first consulting with a lawyer.


1 Rules Implementing Amendments to the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, Advisers Act Release No. 3221, available at http://www.sec.gov/rules/final/2011/ia-3221.pdf; Exemptions for Advisers to Venture Capital Funds, Private Fund Advisers With Less Than $150 Million in Assets Under Management, and Foreign Private Advisers, Advisers Act Release No. 3222, available at http://sec.gov/rules/final/2011/ia-3222.pdf.

2 Exempt reporting advisers must complete the following items of Part 1A of Form ADV: Items 1 (Identifying Information), 2.B. (SEC Reporting by Exempt Reporting Advisers), 3 (Form of Organization), 6 (Other Business Activities), 7 (Financial Industry Affiliations and Private Fund Reporting), 10 (Control Persons), and 11 (Disclosure Information). In addition, exempt reporting advisers must also complete corresponding sections of Schedules A, B, C, and D.

3 “Qualifying investments” generally consist of equity securities of portfolio companies that are directly acquired by the fund. Exemptions for Advisers to Venture Capital Funds, Private Fund Advisers With Less Than $150 Million in Assets Under Management, and Foreign Private Advisers, Advisers Act Release No. 3222, pages 10-19, available at http://sec.gov/rules/final/2011/ia-3222.pdf.

4 Id.

5 Id.

About the author

Jacko Law Group provides tailored legal services and effective strategies for success, delivering exemplary solutions to complex legal and regulatory challenges to ensure that both business efforts and compliance obligations are satisfied.

Related Insights

Posted on Google Google
Alan Markfeld profile picture
Alan Markfeld
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Dharmi is an excellent securities lawyer who understands the law as it pertains to these cases. She is extremely proactive and represents her clients well. I highly recommend Jacko and Dharmi.
Posted on Google Google
Danielle Martin profile picture
Danielle Martin
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I’ve had the privilege of working closely with this firm in my role as Chief Compliance Officer and I can confidently say they are an exceptional compliance partner. Their depth of experience is immediately evidentand they bring a level of practical knowledge. What I truly enjoy is their ability to translate complex regulatory requirements into plain English, often using real, everyday examples that make implementation far more manageable. They are also incredibly responsive and reliable. In a field where timing matters, their prompt communication and thoughtful guidance have been invaluable. If you’re looking for a compliance attorney who combines expertise, clarity, and professionalism, I highly recommend them.
Posted on Google Google
Curt Rocca profile picture
Curt Rocca
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Michelle and the team at Jacko Law Group have helped guide through a variety of critical circumstances as we ventured through the uncharted and unfamiliar territory of becoming and successfully operating as an RIA. I have particularly appreciated Michelle's personal involvement and genuine caring about us and our organization. She has been responsive and her counsel has been consistently on-point and helpful. She artfully guided us through our initial filing process and first SEC exam process - which went very well. Very grateful to Michelle and her team.
Posted on Google Google
Nicholas Di Paolo profile picture
Nicholas Di Paolo
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Michelle and her team were excellent to work with, front to back. They helped me to understand the challenges ahead and were always proactive in their consultation through every step of my transition. JLG truly know the wealth management industry very well and did a great job of understanding the challenges unique to my business. Without them, I can confidently say I would not have felt as comfortable through the transition as I did. Fortunately, that's not something that stops there - Michelle and her team have kept in touch to ensure that I'm on top of certain administrative issues, trends, and simply showing me that they care about my business and success. I look forward to continuing to work with them for many years to come.
Posted on Google Google
Margery Neis profile picture
Margery Neis
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Dharmi Mehta was extremely helpful when my business partner and I transitioned to a new RIA firm. She and her staff were all very professional. Her guidance during our transition was invaluable. I highly recommend Dharmi and Jacko Law Group.
Posted on Google Google
Joseph Burwell profile picture
Joseph Burwell
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Dharmi and Amandeep were a delight to work with. They assisted me with a claim and stuck with me the entire way through. Dharmi's advice was invaluable, and I was most impressed by her clear and professional communication. From beginning-to-end, both Dharmi and Amandeep kept me well informed. Their entire team are proud of their work and rightfully so. Thank you!
Posted on Google Google
Faruk Jaffer profile picture
Faruk Jaffer
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
My mentor once told me that a good attorney is worth their weight in gold — and that couldn't be more true of Michelle and Amanda. Their expertise, professionalism, and responsiveness were top notch every step of the way. It's rare to find legal partners who are not only sharp and thorough, but also genuinely invested in your success. I’m grateful for their guidance and highly recommend them to anyone seeking trusted legal counsel.
Posted on Google Google
everistus etafo profile picture
everistus etafo
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
It is my great Privilege to share my Review of what Atty Dharmi Mehta of Jacko Law Group did for me and by extension for my family. From the first time complimentary conversation we had having spoken to several other Lawyers ,l knew she was the right person for the Job .Because of her background as a former RR ,she was professional,kind, Empathetic,listened and was focused on fighting for me. From a potential of been terminated with cause ,l was able to walk away with a clean U5 with a validation that l did nothing wrong except what was in the best Interest of my clients. I hope nobody ever has to go through what l have Experienced, but if you do ,you want Dharmi Mehta beside you .Rest assured your service Deserve 10 stars but this forum only allows 5. Me and my family are forever grateful and will make sure that any RR who needs an advocate will know about you . Everistus Etafo
Posted on Google Google
Karen Althaus profile picture
Karen Althaus
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I have worked with Jacko Law Group for 2 different business situations that necessitated an attorney. In both cases, the team was very thorough & competent. Their attention to our situation and the extra effort they put into our case(s) was very much appreciated. I would highly recommend Jacko Law Group!