Posted on Google Google
Alan Markfeld profile picture
Alan Markfeld
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Dharmi is an excellent securities lawyer who understands the law as it pertains to these cases. She is extremely proactive and represents her clients well. I highly recommend Jacko and Dharmi.
Posted on Google Google
Danielle Martin profile picture
Danielle Martin
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I’ve had the privilege of working closely with this firm in my role as Chief Compliance Officer and I can confidently say they are an exceptional compliance partner. Their depth of experience is immediately evidentand they bring a level of practical knowledge. What I truly enjoy is their ability to translate complex regulatory requirements into plain English, often using real, everyday examples that make implementation far more manageable. They are also incredibly responsive and reliable. In a field where timing matters, their prompt communication and thoughtful guidance have been invaluable. If you’re looking for a compliance attorney who combines expertise, clarity, and professionalism, I highly recommend them.
Posted on Google Google
Curt Rocca profile picture
Curt Rocca
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Michelle and the team at Jacko Law Group have helped guide through a variety of critical circumstances as we ventured through the uncharted and unfamiliar territory of becoming and successfully operating as an RIA. I have particularly appreciated Michelle's personal involvement and genuine caring about us and our organization. She has been responsive and her counsel has been consistently on-point and helpful. She artfully guided us through our initial filing process and first SEC exam process - which went very well. Very grateful to Michelle and her team.
Posted on Google Google
Nicholas Di Paolo profile picture
Nicholas Di Paolo
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Michelle and her team were excellent to work with, front to back. They helped me to understand the challenges ahead and were always proactive in their consultation through every step of my transition. JLG truly know the wealth management industry very well and did a great job of understanding the challenges unique to my business. Without them, I can confidently say I would not have felt as comfortable through the transition as I did. Fortunately, that's not something that stops there - Michelle and her team have kept in touch to ensure that I'm on top of certain administrative issues, trends, and simply showing me that they care about my business and success. I look forward to continuing to work with them for many years to come.
Posted on Google Google
Margery Neis profile picture
Margery Neis
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Dharmi Mehta was extremely helpful when my business partner and I transitioned to a new RIA firm. She and her staff were all very professional. Her guidance during our transition was invaluable. I highly recommend Dharmi and Jacko Law Group.
Posted on Google Google
Joseph Burwell profile picture
Joseph Burwell
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Dharmi and Amandeep were a delight to work with. They assisted me with a claim and stuck with me the entire way through. Dharmi's advice was invaluable, and I was most impressed by her clear and professional communication. From beginning-to-end, both Dharmi and Amandeep kept me well informed. Their entire team are proud of their work and rightfully so. Thank you!
Posted on Google Google
Faruk Jaffer profile picture
Faruk Jaffer
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
My mentor once told me that a good attorney is worth their weight in gold — and that couldn't be more true of Michelle and Amanda. Their expertise, professionalism, and responsiveness were top notch every step of the way. It's rare to find legal partners who are not only sharp and thorough, but also genuinely invested in your success. I’m grateful for their guidance and highly recommend them to anyone seeking trusted legal counsel.
Posted on Google Google
everistus etafo profile picture
everistus etafo
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
It is my great Privilege to share my Review of what Atty Dharmi Mehta of Jacko Law Group did for me and by extension for my family. From the first time complimentary conversation we had having spoken to several other Lawyers ,l knew she was the right person for the Job .Because of her background as a former RR ,she was professional,kind, Empathetic,listened and was focused on fighting for me. From a potential of been terminated with cause ,l was able to walk away with a clean U5 with a validation that l did nothing wrong except what was in the best Interest of my clients. I hope nobody ever has to go through what l have Experienced, but if you do ,you want Dharmi Mehta beside you .Rest assured your service Deserve 10 stars but this forum only allows 5. Me and my family are forever grateful and will make sure that any RR who needs an advocate will know about you . Everistus Etafo
Posted on Google Google
Karen Althaus profile picture
Karen Althaus
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I have worked with Jacko Law Group for 2 different business situations that necessitated an attorney. In both cases, the team was very thorough & competent. Their attention to our situation and the extra effort they put into our case(s) was very much appreciated. I would highly recommend Jacko Law Group!
  • Home
  • Insights
  • The SEC Issues Responses To Form ADV Part 2 And Pay-to-play Rule Frequently Asked Questions

Form ADV & Disclosure Documents

The SEC Issues Responses To Form ADV Part 2 And Pay-to-play Rule Frequently Asked Questions

Placeholder

On March 18th and 22nd, the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) Division of Investment Management published “Staff Responses to Questions about Part 2 of Form ADV”1 (the “Form ADV Response”) and “Staff Responses to Questions about the Pay to Play Rule”2 (the “Pay-to-Play Response”). The first of these responses clarifies some frequently asked questions regarding compliance, delivery and filing dates of the new Form ADV Part 2, while the second response addresses some frequently asked questions regarding the newly issued Pay-to-Play Rule. Notably, both responses aim to clarify some common questions, and should not be viewed as rules, regulations, or statements of the SEC, which has neither approved nor disapproved this information.3

Highlights from the Form ADV Response

1. Clarifying Points on Delivery – What are the New Compliance Dates for Delivery?

a. Delivery of Form ADV Part 2A – The Brochure

Each adviser currently registered with the SEC whose fiscal year ends on or after December 31, 2010 must include in its next annual updating amendment to its Form ADV a new brochure. Upon filing its new brochure with the SEC, an adviser must (i) begin to deliver the new brochure to new clients and prospective clients in lieu of its old brochure, and (ii) deliver to its existing clients within 60 days of when an adviser is required to file it. Advisers with fiscal year ends of December 31, 2010 are required to file their annual updating amendment using the new Form ADV Part 2 on or before March 31, 2011. Accordingly, these advisers are required to deliver Form ADV Part 2A to their existing clients on or before May 30, 2011 and to new and prospective clients once the brochure is filed.

b. New Compliance Dates for Form ADV Part 2B – The Brochure Supplements

In response to concerns expressed in a letter to the SEC from the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (“SIFMA”), the SEC issued a release on December 28, 2010, indicating that it has agreed to extend the compliance date for the delivery of brochure supplements in order to give advisers “additional time to design, test and implement systems and controls that will assure that each client receives an accurate brochure supplement with respect to the supervised person who provides advice to that client.”4 The length of the extension differs depending on whether firms are already registered or newly registering. The new compliance dates are as follows:

  • Existing Advisers: All investment advisers registered with the SEC as of December 31, 2010, and having a fiscal year ending on December 31, 2010 through April 30, 2011, have until July 31, 2011, to begin delivering brochure supplements to new and prospective clients and until September 30, 2011 to deliver brochure supplements to existing clients.
  • Newly Registered Advisers: All newly registered investment advisers filing their applications for registration from January 1, 2011 through April 30, 2011, have until May 1, 2011 to begin delivering brochure supplements to new and prospective clients and until July 1, 2011 to deliver brochure supplements to existing clients.

2. Delivery of Form ADV Part 2 for Advisers to Private Funds

When asked whether a registered private fund adviser must deliver its brochure to the funds it advises or to the investors in those funds, the SEC clarified that a federal court has found that a “client” of an investment adviser managing a private fund is the fund itself, not an investor in the fund.5 An adviser could, therefore, meet its delivery obligation to a fund client by delivering its brochure to a legal representative of the fund, such as the fund’s general partner, manager or person serving in a similar capacity.

3. How to Draft the Summary of Material Changes

Item 2 of Form ADV Part 2A, Material Changes, requires a brochure filed as part of an annual updating amendment to identify and discuss material changes to the brochure from the last annual update. The SEC clarified that an adviser may choose not to identify and discuss material changes when it is filing a brochure in connection with the transition to the new Part 2A. Item 2 of Part 2A is designed to identify any material changes from one year to the next of the new narrative brochure. However, if the new narrative brochure contains material information, such as a new conflict of interest or new disciplinary information that is being provided to clients for the first time, an adviser may want to highlight the new information for clients.

4. How to Design your Headings, Sub-Parts and Cover Page

The General Instructions to Form ADV Part 2A requires that an adviser respond to each item in Part 2 in the same order with the same heading as they appear in the General Instructions. However, the instruction only requires an adviser to include the heading for each item and to provide responses in the same order as the items appear in Part 2. As a result, an adviser’s brochure does not have to include headings of sub-parts or follow the order of sub-parts within each item in Part 2. In addition, the cover page need not identify it as “Item 1, Cover Page”.

5. Authoring Risk Disclosures for Advisers to Pooled Investment Vehicles

Item 8 of Part 2A requires an adviser to explain the material risks for each significant investment strategy or method of analysis the adviser uses. To that end, the SEC stated that an adviser to pooled investment vehicles may satisfy the requirement of Item 8 by providing a brief explanation of the material risks for each strategy and referring clients to the prospectus, offering memoranda, or other documents that a client participating in the pool will or has received that set out a more detailed discussion of risks.

While the SEC’s Form ADV Response was issued with less than a week before many registered advisers are required to upload their new brochure, the information can be very useful as a quality control measure both now and in the years ahead.

Highlights from the Pay-to-Play Response

In the Pay to Play Response, the SEC reiterated that the Pay-to-Play Rule6 is designed to cover arrangements where investment advisers and the adviser’s “covered associates”7 may seek to obtain advisory business by making or soliciting political contributions to the government officials or politicians responsible for awarding such business. In general, the Pay-to-Play Rule contains three key prohibitions:

  1. A two-year prohibition on an adviser being compensated for advisory services following a political contribution to an elected official who is in a position to influence the selection of the adviser;
  2. A general prohibition against advisers using third-party solicitors who are not themselves “regulated persons” subject to the Pay-to-Play Rules regulation of political contributions; and
  3. A prohibition against an adviser and its covered associates from coordinating campaign contributions from others – a practice referred to as “bundling” – for an elected official who is in a position to influence the selection of the adviser.

Most significantly, the Pay-to-Play Response clarifies that: (1) an investment adviser’s parent company and its employees generally are not deemed to be covered associates; (2) family members of the investment adviser’s employees are not deemed to be covered associates; (3) an investment adviser’s independent contractors are deemed to be covered associates; and (4) interpretations of MSRB Rule G-37 should be considered a useful resource when looking for guidance on the Pay- to-Play Rule, even if the adviser is not subject to MSRB regulations.

In light of the Pay-to-Play Rule, investment advisers should review and, if appropriate, update their policies and procedures manual and codes of ethics. For instance, advisers should consider additional reporting requirements, such as mandatory submission of initial and annual contribution reports in connection with relevant political contributions. Advisers should also consider adopting screening protocols for new hires to help ensure material information is captured prior to employment.

For more information about this topic and other legal services, please contact us at (619) 298-2880, [email protected] or visit www.jackolg.com. Thank you.

JLG works extensively with investment advisers, broker-dealers, investment companies, hedge funds and banks on legal and regulatory compliance matters.

This article is for information purposes and does not contain or convey legal advice. The information herein should not be relied upon in regard to any particular facts or circumstances without first consulting with a lawyer.


1 Staff Responses to Questions About Part 2 of Form ADV, March 18, 2011, available at http://www.sec.gov/divisions/investment/form-adv-part-2-faq.htm.

2 Staff Responses to Questions about the Pay to Play Rule, March 22, 2011, available at http://www.sec.gov/divisions/investment/pay-to-play-faq.htm.

3 Id.

4 SEC, Release No. IA-3129; Amendments to Form ADV; Extension of Compliance Date available at http://www.sec.gov/rules/final/2010/ia-3129.pdf.

5 Goldstein v. Securities and Exchange Commission, 451 F.3d 873 (D.C. Cir. 2006).

6 SEC Rule 206(4)-5.

7 “Covered associates” are those persons associated with an investment adviser who are subject to the pay-to-play rule. See Rule 206(4)-5(a)(1).

About the author

Jacko Law Group provides tailored legal services and effective strategies for success, delivering exemplary solutions to complex legal and regulatory challenges to ensure that both business efforts and compliance obligations are satisfied.

Related Insights