• Home
  • Insights
  • New Disclosure Obligations For Service Providers To ERISA Plans

Legal Risk Management Tips

New Disclosure Obligations For Service Providers To ERISA Plans

Placeholder

In July 2010, the Department of Labor (the “DOL”) issued its interim final regulation (“the “Regulation”) requiring service providers to plans subject to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (“ERISA”), to provide disclosures and descriptions of the services to be provided and the compensation to be received by a “covered service provider”. This Legal Risk Management Tip will provide an overview of the new required disclosures, who will be required to make the disclosures, and what types of information must be included in the disclosures. Due to an extension of the compliance deadline, covered service providers will have until April 1, 2012 to comply with the following new disclosure obligations.

1. Background

Under ERISA, the furnishing of goods, services, or facilities between a plan and a party in interest to the plan generally is prohibited. As a result, a service relationship between a plan and a service provider would constitute a prohibited transaction, because any person providing services to the plan is defined by ERISA to be a ”party in interest” to the plan. However, section 408(b)(2) of ERISA exempts certain arrangements between plans and service providers that otherwise would be prohibited transactions. Specifically, section 408(b)(2) provides relief from ERISA’s prohibited transaction rules for service contracts or arrangements between a plan and a party in interest if the contract or arrangement is: (i) reasonable; (ii) the services are necessary for the establishment or operation of the plan; (iii) and no more than reasonable compensation is paid for the services (emphasis added). The Regulation, which clarifies each of these conditions to the exemption, also provides that non-compliance with the disclosure obligations established by the DOL will render the provision of services to the ERISA plan a prohibited transaction.

2. Scope of the Regulation

In order for a contract or arrangement to be considered reasonable, a “covered service provider” providing services to a “covered plan” must disclose specified information to the responsible plan fiduciary.

a. Definition of “Covered Plan”

The Regulation defines a ”covered plan” as an employee pension benefit plan or a pension plan within the meaning of ERISA, but excludes SIMPLE IRAs,1 Simplified Employee Pension Individual Retirement Accounts (“SEP IRAs”),2 Individual Retirement Accounts (“IRAs”). Generally, the Regulation applies to defined contribution and defined benefit pension, including certain 403(b) plans.

b. Definition of “Covered Service Provider”

The Regulation defines a ”covered service provider” as a service provider that enters into a contract or arrangement with a covered plan and reasonably expects $1,000 or more in compensation, direct or indirect, to be received in connection with providing one or more of the following:

  • Fiduciary or investment advisory services;
  • Certain recordkeeping or brokerage services; and
  • Other services for indirect compensation, including custodial, insurance, legal, accounting, auditing, actuarial, appraisal and/or banking services.

Notably, the definition of covered service provider is broad in scope, and includes entities providing the above services regardless of whether such services will be performed by the covered service provider, an affiliate or a subcontractor.

3. Disclosures Required by Covered Service Providers

Under the Regulation, covered service providers will be required to deliver disclosures to responsible plan fiduciaries of ERISA plans initially, upon request and whenever there are changes to the information contained in the disclosures. The Regulation requires that a covered service provider provide the initial disclosures to the responsible plan fiduciary reasonably in advance of the date the contract or arrangement is entered into, extended or renewed. Among other things, the initial disclosure must provide the responsible plan fiduciary with information regarding:

  • The services to be provided to the covered plan. Notably, there is no specific level of specificity required under the Regulation and the level of detail required to adequately describe the services to be provided will therefore vary depending on the needs of the responsible plan fiduciary.
  • The status of the covered service provider. In this section of the disclosure, the service provider must inform the responsible plan fiduciary whether the service provider will be acting in a fiduciary capacity under ERISA or under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940.
  • The compensation to be paid by the plan to the service provider under the contract or arrangement. For purposes of this disclosure, the DOL has segmented “compensation” into four categories:
    • Direct compensation
    • Indirect compensation
    • Compensation paid among related parties
    • Compensation for termination of arrangement or contract

In addition to covered service providers’ initial obligations to disclose the above information to responsible plan fiduciaries, they are also under an obligation to make ongoing periodic disclosures upon request and when there are changes to the information contained in the disclosures previously provided. For changes in the disclosures information, the service provider must disclose the change as soon as practicable, but not later than 60 days from the date on which the service provider is informed of the changes. However, if the updated disclosure was not possible due to extraordinary circumstances beyond the service provider’s control, the updated information must be disclosed as soon as practicable.

The Regulation does not require the service provider to make the disclosures in any particular manner or format. As a result, the disclosures could be made through multiple documents and means, which for registered investment advisers, may include enhanced disclosures in Form ADV Part 2, investment advisory agreements and a separate disclosure document. Given the fact that the services provided to a covered plan vary from service provider to service provider, the disclosures will need to be customized to meet the requirements of the Regulation.

For more information about this topic, including suggestions on how to draft your 408(b)(2) disclosure document(s), please contact us at (619) 298-2880, [email protected] or visit jackolg.com. Thank you.

JLG works extensively with investment advisers, broker-dealers, investment companies, hedge funds and banks on legal and regulatory compliance matters.

This article is for information purposes and does not contain or convey legal advice. The information herein should not be relied upon in regard to any particular facts or circumstances without first consulting with a lawyer.


1 A SIMPLE IRA plan (Savings Incentive Match Plan for Employees) allows employees and employers to contribute to traditional IRAs set up for employees.

2 A SEP is a simplified employee pension plan. A SEP plan provides employers with a simplified method to make contributions toward their employees’ retirement and, if self-employed, their own retirement. Contributions are made directly to an Individual Retirement Account or Annuity (IRA) set up for each employee (a SEP-IRA).

About the author

Jacko Law Group provides tailored legal services and effective strategies for success, delivering exemplary solutions to complex legal and regulatory challenges to ensure that both business efforts and compliance obligations are satisfied.

Related Insights

Posted on Google Google
Alan Markfeld profile picture
Alan Markfeld
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Dharmi is an excellent securities lawyer who understands the law as it pertains to these cases. She is extremely proactive and represents her clients well. I highly recommend Jacko and Dharmi.
Posted on Google Google
Danielle Martin profile picture
Danielle Martin
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I’ve had the privilege of working closely with this firm in my role as Chief Compliance Officer and I can confidently say they are an exceptional compliance partner. Their depth of experience is immediately evidentand they bring a level of practical knowledge. What I truly enjoy is their ability to translate complex regulatory requirements into plain English, often using real, everyday examples that make implementation far more manageable. They are also incredibly responsive and reliable. In a field where timing matters, their prompt communication and thoughtful guidance have been invaluable. If you’re looking for a compliance attorney who combines expertise, clarity, and professionalism, I highly recommend them.
Posted on Google Google
Curt Rocca profile picture
Curt Rocca
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Michelle and the team at Jacko Law Group have helped guide through a variety of critical circumstances as we ventured through the uncharted and unfamiliar territory of becoming and successfully operating as an RIA. I have particularly appreciated Michelle's personal involvement and genuine caring about us and our organization. She has been responsive and her counsel has been consistently on-point and helpful. She artfully guided us through our initial filing process and first SEC exam process - which went very well. Very grateful to Michelle and her team.
Posted on Google Google
Nicholas Di Paolo profile picture
Nicholas Di Paolo
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Michelle and her team were excellent to work with, front to back. They helped me to understand the challenges ahead and were always proactive in their consultation through every step of my transition. JLG truly know the wealth management industry very well and did a great job of understanding the challenges unique to my business. Without them, I can confidently say I would not have felt as comfortable through the transition as I did. Fortunately, that's not something that stops there - Michelle and her team have kept in touch to ensure that I'm on top of certain administrative issues, trends, and simply showing me that they care about my business and success. I look forward to continuing to work with them for many years to come.
Posted on Google Google
Margery Neis profile picture
Margery Neis
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Dharmi Mehta was extremely helpful when my business partner and I transitioned to a new RIA firm. She and her staff were all very professional. Her guidance during our transition was invaluable. I highly recommend Dharmi and Jacko Law Group.
Posted on Google Google
Joseph Burwell profile picture
Joseph Burwell
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Dharmi and Amandeep were a delight to work with. They assisted me with a claim and stuck with me the entire way through. Dharmi's advice was invaluable, and I was most impressed by her clear and professional communication. From beginning-to-end, both Dharmi and Amandeep kept me well informed. Their entire team are proud of their work and rightfully so. Thank you!
Posted on Google Google
Faruk Jaffer profile picture
Faruk Jaffer
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
My mentor once told me that a good attorney is worth their weight in gold — and that couldn't be more true of Michelle and Amanda. Their expertise, professionalism, and responsiveness were top notch every step of the way. It's rare to find legal partners who are not only sharp and thorough, but also genuinely invested in your success. I’m grateful for their guidance and highly recommend them to anyone seeking trusted legal counsel.
Posted on Google Google
everistus etafo profile picture
everistus etafo
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
It is my great Privilege to share my Review of what Atty Dharmi Mehta of Jacko Law Group did for me and by extension for my family. From the first time complimentary conversation we had having spoken to several other Lawyers ,l knew she was the right person for the Job .Because of her background as a former RR ,she was professional,kind, Empathetic,listened and was focused on fighting for me. From a potential of been terminated with cause ,l was able to walk away with a clean U5 with a validation that l did nothing wrong except what was in the best Interest of my clients. I hope nobody ever has to go through what l have Experienced, but if you do ,you want Dharmi Mehta beside you .Rest assured your service Deserve 10 stars but this forum only allows 5. Me and my family are forever grateful and will make sure that any RR who needs an advocate will know about you . Everistus Etafo
Posted on Google Google
Karen Althaus profile picture
Karen Althaus
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I have worked with Jacko Law Group for 2 different business situations that necessitated an attorney. In both cases, the team was very thorough & competent. Their attention to our situation and the extra effort they put into our case(s) was very much appreciated. I would highly recommend Jacko Law Group!