Investment Adviser Regulatory Counsel (SEC & State)

Looking Ahead: The Red Flags Rules

Placeholder

In June of 2008, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the federal banking regulators issued joint regulations implementing Sections 114 and 315 of the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act of 2003 (FACT Act).1 Known as the “Red Flag Rules”, financial institutions and creditors with covered accounts are required to develop and implement written identity theft prevention programs for the detection, prevention, and mitigation of identity theft in connection with the opening of certain accounts or certain existing accounts.2 Enforceable in May 2009, the identity theft program must be able to detect, identify, and respond to indicators of possible fraudulent activity that, when detected, would prompt creditors to determine whether there is any fraudulent activity afoot.3

To be subject to the FTC’s rules, a securities institution must first fall within the FACT Act’s definition of either a “creditor” or a “financial institution”. A “creditor” is an entity that is regularly involved with the extension, renewal or continuation of credit.4 A “financial institution” includes banks, credit unions, savings and loans, but also any other person holding a transaction account either directly or indirectly belonging to a consumer.5 For this purpose, a “transaction account” means a deposit or account on which the depositor or account holder is permitted to make withdrawals by negotiable or transferable instrument, payment orders of withdrawal, telephone transfers, or other similar items for the purpose of making payments or transfers to third persons or others.6

Certain broker-dealers may fall under the definition of a creditor if they extend credit to customers as part of their regular business by allowing them to trade on margin. Other broker-dealers may be deemed a financial institution if they maintain custodial accounts which allow customers to make multiple account withdrawals for the purposes of payments and transfers to third parties. Similarly, some mutual funds allow investors to direct redemption payments to be made to third parties. This too would convert the fund into a transaction account and consequently make the fund a financial institution.

As long as a securities institution conducts activities causing it to fall under the FTC’s jurisdiction, all activities performed by that institution will be subject to the Red Flag Rules. For example, although most investment advisers do not maintain custody of client accounts or advance funds to clients as part of their advisory business, as true “dual registrant” (i.e. a firm registered both as a registered investment adviser and broker-dealer with the SEC) may need to comply if the firm’s broker-dealer business falls within the definition of a financial institution or creditor.

To be subject to the Red Flag Rules, the securities institution must not only fall within the definition of a creditor of financial institution but, also hold “covered accounts” for its customers. The term “covered account” means an account used primarily for personal, family or household purposes which allows for multiple transactions or payments as well as “[a]ny other account that the financial institution or creditor offers or maintains for which there is a reasonably foreseeable risk to customers or to the safety and soundness of the financial institution or creditor from identity theft, including financial, operational, compliance, reputation, or litigation risks.”7 In practice, most accounts held by securities firms or investment companies will fall within the definition of covered account. This is because personal and non-public information is used in opening and maintaining accounts or investment company interests and this poses a reasonably foreseeable risk of identity theft which is likely to qualify the account as a covered account for the purposes of the Rules

Similar to the proposed revised Regulation S-P, the Red Flags Rules allow businesses great flexibility in designing an identity theft prevention program suitable to the nature of a company’s business operations as well as appropriate for their size and capabilities.8 As guidance to assist businesses in designing and implementing a written identity theft prevention program, the FTC identified 26 possible red flag indicators to serve as examples for creditors to use as a starting off point. For more information regarding the possible red flag indicators, please visit http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2007/pdf/07-5453.pdf.

Ordinary securities activities will not cause most institutions to fall into either category. However, if these institutions provide ancillary services or are registered as something other than a broker, dealer, investment company or investment adviser, it could still be caught by these provisions. Regardless of whether the firm is indeed subject to the FTC’s jurisdiction, all securities firms should pay close attention to the Red Flags Rules. When considering its proposals to amend Regulation S-P, the SEC looked at the regimes imposed by its fellow regulators in an attempt to promote consistency between its rules and guidelines and those of the other federal agencies that oversee the financial services industry. Many of the proposed changes to Regulation S-P discussed above appear to closely resemble certain rules of the FTC. It is therefore possible that the SEC may take its cue from the Red Flag Rules and impose similar requirements on securities firms, either in further revisions to Regulation S-P or in future regulations. In the meanwhile, be sure you are prepared for the enforcement of these Red Flags Rules in 2009.

Author: Michelle Jacko, Managing Partner, Jacko Law Group, PC (“JLG”). JLG works extensively with investment advisers, broker-dealers, investment companies, hedge funds and banks on legal and regulatory compliance matters.

For more information about this topic and other legal services, please contact us at (619) 298-2880, [email protected] or visit jackolg.com. Thank you.

This article is for information purposes and does not contain or convey legal advice. The information herein should not be relied upon in regard to any particular facts or circumstances without first consulting with a lawyer.


1 FTC Business Alert, New ‘Red Flag’ Requirements for Financial Institutions and Creditors Will Help Fight Identity Theft, available at http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/edu/pubs/business/alerts/alt050.shtm.

2 16 C.F.R. § 681.2.

3 Supra, note 1.

4 16 C.F.R. § 681.2(b)(5).

5 15 U.S.C. § 1681a(t).

6 12 U.S.C. § 461(C).

7 16 C.F.R. § 681.2(b)(3).

8 Supra, note 1.

About the author

Managing Partner and CEO

Michelle L. Jacko, Esq. is the Managing Partner and CEO of Jacko Law Group, PC (“JLG”), which offers securities, corporate, real estate, and employment law counsel to broker-dealers, investment advise...

Related Insights

Posted on Google Google
Alan Markfeld profile picture
Alan Markfeld
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Dharmi is an excellent securities lawyer who understands the law as it pertains to these cases. She is extremely proactive and represents her clients well. I highly recommend Jacko and Dharmi.
Posted on Google Google
Danielle Martin profile picture
Danielle Martin
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I’ve had the privilege of working closely with this firm in my role as Chief Compliance Officer and I can confidently say they are an exceptional compliance partner. Their depth of experience is immediately evidentand they bring a level of practical knowledge. What I truly enjoy is their ability to translate complex regulatory requirements into plain English, often using real, everyday examples that make implementation far more manageable. They are also incredibly responsive and reliable. In a field where timing matters, their prompt communication and thoughtful guidance have been invaluable. If you’re looking for a compliance attorney who combines expertise, clarity, and professionalism, I highly recommend them.
Posted on Google Google
Curt Rocca profile picture
Curt Rocca
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Michelle and the team at Jacko Law Group have helped guide through a variety of critical circumstances as we ventured through the uncharted and unfamiliar territory of becoming and successfully operating as an RIA. I have particularly appreciated Michelle's personal involvement and genuine caring about us and our organization. She has been responsive and her counsel has been consistently on-point and helpful. She artfully guided us through our initial filing process and first SEC exam process - which went very well. Very grateful to Michelle and her team.
Posted on Google Google
Nicholas Di Paolo profile picture
Nicholas Di Paolo
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Michelle and her team were excellent to work with, front to back. They helped me to understand the challenges ahead and were always proactive in their consultation through every step of my transition. JLG truly know the wealth management industry very well and did a great job of understanding the challenges unique to my business. Without them, I can confidently say I would not have felt as comfortable through the transition as I did. Fortunately, that's not something that stops there - Michelle and her team have kept in touch to ensure that I'm on top of certain administrative issues, trends, and simply showing me that they care about my business and success. I look forward to continuing to work with them for many years to come.
Posted on Google Google
Margery Neis profile picture
Margery Neis
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Dharmi Mehta was extremely helpful when my business partner and I transitioned to a new RIA firm. She and her staff were all very professional. Her guidance during our transition was invaluable. I highly recommend Dharmi and Jacko Law Group.
Posted on Google Google
Joseph Burwell profile picture
Joseph Burwell
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Dharmi and Amandeep were a delight to work with. They assisted me with a claim and stuck with me the entire way through. Dharmi's advice was invaluable, and I was most impressed by her clear and professional communication. From beginning-to-end, both Dharmi and Amandeep kept me well informed. Their entire team are proud of their work and rightfully so. Thank you!
Posted on Google Google
Faruk Jaffer profile picture
Faruk Jaffer
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
My mentor once told me that a good attorney is worth their weight in gold — and that couldn't be more true of Michelle and Amanda. Their expertise, professionalism, and responsiveness were top notch every step of the way. It's rare to find legal partners who are not only sharp and thorough, but also genuinely invested in your success. I’m grateful for their guidance and highly recommend them to anyone seeking trusted legal counsel.
Posted on Google Google
everistus etafo profile picture
everistus etafo
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
It is my great Privilege to share my Review of what Atty Dharmi Mehta of Jacko Law Group did for me and by extension for my family. From the first time complimentary conversation we had having spoken to several other Lawyers ,l knew she was the right person for the Job .Because of her background as a former RR ,she was professional,kind, Empathetic,listened and was focused on fighting for me. From a potential of been terminated with cause ,l was able to walk away with a clean U5 with a validation that l did nothing wrong except what was in the best Interest of my clients. I hope nobody ever has to go through what l have Experienced, but if you do ,you want Dharmi Mehta beside you .Rest assured your service Deserve 10 stars but this forum only allows 5. Me and my family are forever grateful and will make sure that any RR who needs an advocate will know about you . Everistus Etafo
Posted on Google Google
Karen Althaus profile picture
Karen Althaus
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I have worked with Jacko Law Group for 2 different business situations that necessitated an attorney. In both cases, the team was very thorough & competent. Their attention to our situation and the extra effort they put into our case(s) was very much appreciated. I would highly recommend Jacko Law Group!